Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Reynard" data-source="post: 9540700" data-attributes="member: 467">Why is it that some folks absolutely must argue the "should" when it is obvious by context that no attempt to set down a universal doctrine is being made?The poster is asking you what you do. Why not just answer the question that is asked?For my part: i am a "all combat rolls in the open" type GM, and most other rolls. I will use players rolling in the tower (ie they are rolling hut they don't know what they got) when using a VTT that has that capability, but at the table I usually have them roll things like perception in the open (but not necessarily against a revealed DC).</blockquote>