Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should the DM roll in the open?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Swarmkeeper" data-source="post: 9541491" data-attributes="member: 6921763"><p>I’ll preface my comments with this: there’s more than one way to have fun with this game we all love. I’m not judging any playstyles here, I’m just stating what I prefer (and what our table prefers) and why. Based on what I’ve read, I wouldn’t be a good fit for many tables and many others here may not be a good fit for our table. But that is ok. I’m glad people are enjoying themselves with this game!</p><p></p><p>We roll in the open at our table. For everything. Transparency and trust are certainly part of it, but are not the only reasons.</p><p></p><p>IMO, there’s already plenty of mystery and hidden information in the game world - much of it intentionally created by the DM for the players/PCs to discover, some of it unintentional due to the imperfection of human communication. I don’t believe in adding yet another element (ie the results of die rolls) to that list for the players and their characters.</p><p></p><p>We’re also a table where the DM is not enforcing any kind of separation of player and character knowledge. We don’t believe it is the DM’s role to enforce how the players choose to portray their characters. In fact, we view any effort to tamp down metagaming by the DM to be an additional burden to an already full workload. That said, a player’s knowledge may not even be correct in the game world and the only real way to know is to test that knowledge via their PC. The DM at our table will adjudicate die rolls and the players, on behalf of their PCs, can choose to interpret that adjudication any way they wish.</p><p></p><p>As for fudging die rolls, when I am a player, I truly can’t stand it. I’m sure some DMs use fudging sparingly and are very adept at it but, IME, those DMs are few and far between. When it is obvious, it feels to me like a real infringement on player agency. I just believe that if a DM cannot accept the result of a die roll one way or another, then that die just shouldn’t really be rolled in the first place.</p><p></p><p>TL;DR: we roll in the open for everything and it works for us. If your table doesn’t and it works for you, that’s great too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Swarmkeeper, post: 9541491, member: 6921763"] I’ll preface my comments with this: there’s more than one way to have fun with this game we all love. I’m not judging any playstyles here, I’m just stating what I prefer (and what our table prefers) and why. Based on what I’ve read, I wouldn’t be a good fit for many tables and many others here may not be a good fit for our table. But that is ok. I’m glad people are enjoying themselves with this game! We roll in the open at our table. For everything. Transparency and trust are certainly part of it, but are not the only reasons. IMO, there’s already plenty of mystery and hidden information in the game world - much of it intentionally created by the DM for the players/PCs to discover, some of it unintentional due to the imperfection of human communication. I don’t believe in adding yet another element (ie the results of die rolls) to that list for the players and their characters. We’re also a table where the DM is not enforcing any kind of separation of player and character knowledge. We don’t believe it is the DM’s role to enforce how the players choose to portray their characters. In fact, we view any effort to tamp down metagaming by the DM to be an additional burden to an already full workload. That said, a player’s knowledge may not even be correct in the game world and the only real way to know is to test that knowledge via their PC. The DM at our table will adjudicate die rolls and the players, on behalf of their PCs, can choose to interpret that adjudication any way they wish. As for fudging die rolls, when I am a player, I truly can’t stand it. I’m sure some DMs use fudging sparingly and are very adept at it but, IME, those DMs are few and far between. When it is obvious, it feels to me like a real infringement on player agency. I just believe that if a DM cannot accept the result of a die roll one way or another, then that die just shouldn’t really be rolled in the first place. TL;DR: we roll in the open for everything and it works for us. If your table doesn’t and it works for you, that’s great too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should the DM roll in the open?
Top