Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="painandgreed" data-source="post: 2860171" data-attributes="member: 24969"><p>No, the paladin is being selfish because he expects others to follow his will and moral code when he obviously hasn't made these agreements with them to begin with. Classic disruptive paladin syndrom. I agree that the paladin is in the wrong party but since the paladin is in the minority here and contantly being disruptive in the party, he should leave because he was in error and should have accepted his debt to the party for the right to destory such items unless he had gotten them to agree to other arrangements beforehand. Sure, the paladin was only doing what a paladin does, but everybody is not a paladin. There are even other paths that would mean destruction of the items and still reward the party. One being the possiblity of selling, or turning over the item to a good church for a reward so they may destroy it. In most games I've played, the destruction of such items for ones good gods means either status or XP and there is typically a market for them. In that that paladin is hogging this glory for himself without thought of his compatriots (or even giving them a chance to share in the honor) reeks of selfishness.</p></blockquote><p></p>