Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TheYeti1775" data-source="post: 2860238" data-attributes="member: 20914">Didn't vote cause it's bothReally couldn't vote like anything it's a two-sided coin.My example falls to something that's non-offensive but a defensive item.Robe of Protection +2 AC versus GoodHow does the Paladin rule in this instance?  It was worn by a CN mage character who justified it by Clerics persucute the Paladin (World was Valus - written by our own Destan), it didn't matter if they were good or not.  So who was to say we couldn't be attacked by a 'good' cleric.  Now there was one item the same said mage said he would destroy but sold and covered some armor costs for the Paladin.  If he ever found out well he would be upset for sure.  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh    :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /> There are sometimes though when it is perfectly acceptable for the Paladin to utterly destroy something.    Though I do like the thought of a 'Church' rewarding the party in some fashion for assisting in this.  I thought the Lord and Shopkeeper things especially good examples of the gray area this involves.Add this to the fact that Wizards are your primary identifier of magics so the Paladin has to rely on the mage to say what anything does.</blockquote>