Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should the PHB have an arcane half caster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8925064" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>At least that's a logical reason I can respect! I'm not the biggest fan of Artificer but it's not a disaster either.</p><p></p><p>This is not a compelling argument on any level.</p><p></p><p>There have been four editions where Bard was a proper class (not a weird dual-class thing or an optional class from Dragon). 2E, 3E, 4E, and 5E.</p><p></p><p>2E - Advanced extremely fast, to the point where you actually got fifth-level spells before a Fighter/Mage did. Were more than a "half-caster". A 2/3rds or 3/4s caster, which is more appropriate. Was a true Jack of all Trades.</p><p></p><p>3E - The only edition where the Bard was a "half-caster". Also the only edition where the Bard was a <em>trashfire</em>. All negative Bard memes originate with 3E, because 3E's vision of the Bard was absolutely idiotic. Only the fact that being a caster was a huuuuuuuuuuuuge advantage over not being a caster saved them from being bottom tier. But a failure on every possible level.</p><p></p><p>4E - Bards were, as much as anyone, "full casters", with a huge suite of magical abilities, and bloody effective ones too.</p><p></p><p>5E - Bard are full casters. Jack of all trades but master of none is NOT a viable design for a <em>balanced</em> class in 5E, so they actually got good at casting and were made less of a joke-class than 3E.</p><p></p><p>So 50% of editions Bards are full casters, 25% they're 2/3rds or 3/4s casters, 25% they're 1/2 casters. Seems like your<em> own argument</em> suggests they should be full casters based on that logic. You can't just exclude 5E because it's current lol.</p><p></p><p>As for "Gish", Bards are absolutely not your "Gish". A Gish is a Fighter/Mage, not a Bard. Magus would be your Gish if anything.</p><p></p><p></p><p>100% agree!</p><p></p><p>D&D is definitely missing it's "Swordmage" or Magus type!</p><p></p><p>100% disagree that they should be an "Arcane half-caster". None of those characters are half-arsed Wizards who are also not great Fighters.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, the Warlock chassis is much better for characters like the ones you're describe. Yes, give them new spells, but give them the Warlock chassis, not an "Arcane half-caster" chassis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8925064, member: 18"] At least that's a logical reason I can respect! I'm not the biggest fan of Artificer but it's not a disaster either. This is not a compelling argument on any level. There have been four editions where Bard was a proper class (not a weird dual-class thing or an optional class from Dragon). 2E, 3E, 4E, and 5E. 2E - Advanced extremely fast, to the point where you actually got fifth-level spells before a Fighter/Mage did. Were more than a "half-caster". A 2/3rds or 3/4s caster, which is more appropriate. Was a true Jack of all Trades. 3E - The only edition where the Bard was a "half-caster". Also the only edition where the Bard was a [I]trashfire[/I]. All negative Bard memes originate with 3E, because 3E's vision of the Bard was absolutely idiotic. Only the fact that being a caster was a huuuuuuuuuuuuge advantage over not being a caster saved them from being bottom tier. But a failure on every possible level. 4E - Bards were, as much as anyone, "full casters", with a huge suite of magical abilities, and bloody effective ones too. 5E - Bard are full casters. Jack of all trades but master of none is NOT a viable design for a [I]balanced[/I] class in 5E, so they actually got good at casting and were made less of a joke-class than 3E. So 50% of editions Bards are full casters, 25% they're 2/3rds or 3/4s casters, 25% they're 1/2 casters. Seems like your[I] own argument[/I] suggests they should be full casters based on that logic. You can't just exclude 5E because it's current lol. As for "Gish", Bards are absolutely not your "Gish". A Gish is a Fighter/Mage, not a Bard. Magus would be your Gish if anything. 100% agree! D&D is definitely missing it's "Swordmage" or Magus type! 100% disagree that they should be an "Arcane half-caster". None of those characters are half-arsed Wizards who are also not great Fighters. Like I said, the Warlock chassis is much better for characters like the ones you're describe. Yes, give them new spells, but give them the Warlock chassis, not an "Arcane half-caster" chassis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should the PHB have an arcane half caster?
Top