Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should the whole idea of class skills be done away with?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zappo" data-source="post: 1110459" data-attributes="member: 633"><p>But it is fairly logical to say that training in athletics took some time away from the wizard's magical studies. After all, we aren't talking about fitness; having more than a few ranks in Tumble means that you're a well-trained pro, able to jump over people while dodging blows.</p><p></p><p>For this reason, I think that the correct way to represent that character would be to either spend a feat to be allowed Tumble as a class skill, or take a level in rogue or monk (incidentally, the soon-to-be-released Planescape 3E includes a feat that allows Ciphers to ignore monk multiclass restrictions, on account of their lifestyle), or sacrificing spellcraft or knowledge(arcana). Naturally, these options deliver a blow to the character's spellcasting capacity. And that's just how it should be; developing some skills means that you won't develop others.</p><p></p><p>If the character concept is a wizard that is just as powerful as the other party wizard, plus he can tumble - well then, that's evidently a more powerful character, best formalized with either a higher level or higher stats, rather than by changing the rules so that a more powerful character fits into the same level as another that is only guilty of being vanilla.</p><p></p><p>Same thing for the wizard tyrant. If he actually spends time doing politics and running the nation, well that time is subtracted from his arcane studies. If he doesn't - then he can't learn how to do it. If he manages to do <em>both</em>, then he is logically more powerful (being a wizard AND a diplomat), mechanically having a higher level or higher stats.</p><p></p><p>The classical example is Gandalf, of course. Powerful wizard AND excellent fighter (ignoring the maiar thingy). It's pointless to complain that D&D can't represent him because fighters can't cast and wizards can't fight. They <em>can</em>, if they multiclass, and it turns out they can't play in your party because of too high a level. Well duh, of course, I say. If the character is <em>conceptually</em> more powerful than any other character in the party, it <em>will</em> lack the feats, skill points, whatever, to be correctly represented at that level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zappo, post: 1110459, member: 633"] But it is fairly logical to say that training in athletics took some time away from the wizard's magical studies. After all, we aren't talking about fitness; having more than a few ranks in Tumble means that you're a well-trained pro, able to jump over people while dodging blows. For this reason, I think that the correct way to represent that character would be to either spend a feat to be allowed Tumble as a class skill, or take a level in rogue or monk (incidentally, the soon-to-be-released Planescape 3E includes a feat that allows Ciphers to ignore monk multiclass restrictions, on account of their lifestyle), or sacrificing spellcraft or knowledge(arcana). Naturally, these options deliver a blow to the character's spellcasting capacity. And that's just how it should be; developing some skills means that you won't develop others. If the character concept is a wizard that is just as powerful as the other party wizard, plus he can tumble - well then, that's evidently a more powerful character, best formalized with either a higher level or higher stats, rather than by changing the rules so that a more powerful character fits into the same level as another that is only guilty of being vanilla. Same thing for the wizard tyrant. If he actually spends time doing politics and running the nation, well that time is subtracted from his arcane studies. If he doesn't - then he can't learn how to do it. If he manages to do [i]both[/i], then he is logically more powerful (being a wizard AND a diplomat), mechanically having a higher level or higher stats. The classical example is Gandalf, of course. Powerful wizard AND excellent fighter (ignoring the maiar thingy). It's pointless to complain that D&D can't represent him because fighters can't cast and wizards can't fight. They [i]can[/i], if they multiclass, and it turns out they can't play in your party because of too high a level. Well duh, of course, I say. If the character is [i]conceptually[/i] more powerful than any other character in the party, it [i]will[/i] lack the feats, skill points, whatever, to be correctly represented at that level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should the whole idea of class skills be done away with?
Top