Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should there be a "Vile/Mature" line of products?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. NRG" data-source="post: 837929" data-attributes="member: 7697"><p>If and only if there are enough people offended by its inclusion in the "regular" material to justify removing it. Also, if and only if there is enough of a market for "vile" to support a product line.</p><p></p><p>I'll draw an analogy. If I am offended by the concept of, say, summoning extra-planar beings (for whatever reason - it need not be relevant), should WoTC make a new line of products that include all of the information about extra-planar summoning and remove anything related from subsequent releases of their core books? After all, I am a consumer of their products, and I am offended by the inclusion of this material, right? The answer is clearly no, they should not modify their products this way. It bears consideration why the answer is no.</p><p></p><p>What I fear here is an attempt to remove a piece of the gaming environment, segregating it into a separate line. I believe the market is pretty small as is, and producing a line of products that will appeal only to an even smaller sub-segment has proven (historically) usually to be a bad idea for a large one-size-fits-all company -- thus the d20 licensing agreement. </p><p></p><p>If both of the conditions above (enough people offended, enough support for a product line) are not met, I would argue that the content should continue to be included in Dragon, Dungeon, and whatever other products WoTC thinks are appropriate. People can (and will) bitch if this happens. That said, people can (and will) bitch anyway. Some people may choose not to subscribe to the magazines if vile content is included. That said, people can and will choose not to subscribe if it's not included, too. </p><p></p><p>The issue for WoTC is a practical one, not a moral one. Which path will, in the end, bring them more money? Find the answer to that question and you can guess what they're going to do next.</p><p></p><p>NRG</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. NRG, post: 837929, member: 7697"] If and only if there are enough people offended by its inclusion in the "regular" material to justify removing it. Also, if and only if there is enough of a market for "vile" to support a product line. I'll draw an analogy. If I am offended by the concept of, say, summoning extra-planar beings (for whatever reason - it need not be relevant), should WoTC make a new line of products that include all of the information about extra-planar summoning and remove anything related from subsequent releases of their core books? After all, I am a consumer of their products, and I am offended by the inclusion of this material, right? The answer is clearly no, they should not modify their products this way. It bears consideration why the answer is no. What I fear here is an attempt to remove a piece of the gaming environment, segregating it into a separate line. I believe the market is pretty small as is, and producing a line of products that will appeal only to an even smaller sub-segment has proven (historically) usually to be a bad idea for a large one-size-fits-all company -- thus the d20 licensing agreement. If both of the conditions above (enough people offended, enough support for a product line) are not met, I would argue that the content should continue to be included in Dragon, Dungeon, and whatever other products WoTC thinks are appropriate. People can (and will) bitch if this happens. That said, people can (and will) bitch anyway. Some people may choose not to subscribe to the magazines if vile content is included. That said, people can and will choose not to subscribe if it's not included, too. The issue for WoTC is a practical one, not a moral one. Which path will, in the end, bring them more money? Find the answer to that question and you can guess what they're going to do next. NRG [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should there be a "Vile/Mature" line of products?
Top