Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Knight Otu" data-source="post: 839836" data-attributes="member: 192">As for the Sigil's first question, yes, a distinct line would be a good idea.The second question... I'm split on that. Dungeon and Dragon should, in my opinion, be representative for the D&D game as a whole (that also means the D20 market!), and thus should include material that is usable for a wide range of people. What does that mean foe "Vile/Mature" material?For one, it would increase the breadth of material presented in the magazines, but it would make it less attractive for those who have a dislike for that material. It has been more or less proven that this material creates more reaction (positive or negative) than pretty much every other sort of material. Overall, I think Dragon and Dungeon would best be considered "Core" for the purpose of this discussion (Personally, I think a 1/year regular feature might be interesting - It would give people who want vile material just that, and people who dislike it can skip the issue. Not a perfect solution, but an idea).As for Anthony Valterra's questions - Yes, I think there is a market, and i would propably buy the books (of course, i buy pretty much everything WotC <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!    :o"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> ).I don't think i would overly advertize the products, but I'd propably let people know that "This book might very much be what you are looking for". Defending the line... i usually try not to get into that kind of argument as they tend to get hot pretty quickly, but I guess I'd at least try from time to time.Participating... maybe.</blockquote>

Verification