Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should WotC launch a new Living Campaign with D&D Next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DerekSTheRed" data-source="post: 6095625" data-attributes="member: 55770"><p>I stayed away from mentioning Campaign Settings too much in my original post. I thought it would start a tangent that would overshadow the question of whether a Living Campaign was something that should be done. If one is to be done, then the question of which campaign is important. And since that tangent happened anyway, I might as well give my thoughts on the subject.</p><p></p><p>I do think that the Greyhawk setting was perfect for a Living Campaign. I know some desire a new campaign setting, but being able to re-use existing canon from Greyhawk was a big pull for a lot of players to try out LG at 3E launch and re-using an existing setting for D&D Next would have similar benefits. Greyhawk is a generic medieval European style campaign that had core rules and cosmology. It was also pretty much abandoned after the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer was published. This meant the players drove the story as opposed to Living Forgotten Realms which had novels drive their story. Since it was a impossible for the Living Forgotten Realms canon to interact with the novel line, players didn't have that sense of ownership that LG had.</p><p></p><p>Any campaign setting used in a future Living Campaign for D&D Next (if one exists) should not be in Forgotten Realms or any setting with a novel line to compete with players. I would prefer it use an existing Campaign Setting as opposed to a new one, but that may not be possible if no candidate can work. It really needs to be a generic medieval European style to attract new players seeking that typical D&D feel. Yes it will have to use a core rule set which I know some might not like, but it has to appeal to the broadest user base.</p><p></p><p>It will be interesting to see what WotC does with Eberron for Next. It <a href="http://keith-baker.com/have-a-gloomy-holiday/" target="_blank">might not be supported</a> they way it was in the past and could be a candidate for a Living Campaign if there won't be any more Eberron novels. There are also other older Campaign Settings that could be used like Birthright (my favorite candidate). I'd rather not see a relaunch of Living Greyhawk. It just wouldn't feel right and would give off the appearance of pandering.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DerekSTheRed, post: 6095625, member: 55770"] I stayed away from mentioning Campaign Settings too much in my original post. I thought it would start a tangent that would overshadow the question of whether a Living Campaign was something that should be done. If one is to be done, then the question of which campaign is important. And since that tangent happened anyway, I might as well give my thoughts on the subject. I do think that the Greyhawk setting was perfect for a Living Campaign. I know some desire a new campaign setting, but being able to re-use existing canon from Greyhawk was a big pull for a lot of players to try out LG at 3E launch and re-using an existing setting for D&D Next would have similar benefits. Greyhawk is a generic medieval European style campaign that had core rules and cosmology. It was also pretty much abandoned after the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer was published. This meant the players drove the story as opposed to Living Forgotten Realms which had novels drive their story. Since it was a impossible for the Living Forgotten Realms canon to interact with the novel line, players didn't have that sense of ownership that LG had. Any campaign setting used in a future Living Campaign for D&D Next (if one exists) should not be in Forgotten Realms or any setting with a novel line to compete with players. I would prefer it use an existing Campaign Setting as opposed to a new one, but that may not be possible if no candidate can work. It really needs to be a generic medieval European style to attract new players seeking that typical D&D feel. Yes it will have to use a core rule set which I know some might not like, but it has to appeal to the broadest user base. It will be interesting to see what WotC does with Eberron for Next. It [URL="http://keith-baker.com/have-a-gloomy-holiday/"]might not be supported[/URL] they way it was in the past and could be a candidate for a Living Campaign if there won't be any more Eberron novels. There are also other older Campaign Settings that could be used like Birthright (my favorite candidate). I'd rather not see a relaunch of Living Greyhawk. It just wouldn't feel right and would give off the appearance of pandering. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should WotC launch a new Living Campaign with D&D Next?
Top