Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cameron" data-source="post: 3637761" data-attributes="member: 52735">How other people perceive WotC because of an action by somebody else is not really a concern of mine. To be brutally frank, if WotC gains the reputation of being arrogant as a result of that, well, *IMO* it is about time...However, that is not the purpose here.Because of my bias against WotC, and because this poll is clearly not about whether WotC is arrogant or not, that is why I am refraining from voting. The statement I would be making with the vote is not the one I am trying to convey. However, I cannot, in good conscience, support WotC in any way either. Hence my stance in this thread.PS. You might, Scott, want to explore the reasons behind my anti-WotC stance instead of trying to accuse me of being arrogant, if you really want to help WotC gain a wider audience. Not that I am so important that my words mean something, mind you, but because I believe that if the most active "faces" of WotC on the internet (the mods the regulate the forums there and thus have the highest contact with the general public) are turning people off WotC products, that should be a legitimate concern by the powers that be at WotC. That is basic business sense, isn't it?</blockquote>