Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should WoTC try again with Chainmail?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cergorach" data-source="post: 5478729" data-attributes="member: 725"><p>Chainmail miniatures never were pre-painted, so I'll leave the pre-painted discussion to another recent thread.</p><p></p><p>I see no reason why WotC would need or want to kick GW on it's behind in the miniatures market. They would be like any other competitor, and instead of taking it's queues from GW it should take it's queues from Privateer Press, they started with a few factions and a limited amount of miniatures to create a skirmish game, over the years it has evolved to a large range with a lot of factions. And battles are getting bigger and bigger.</p><p></p><p>But to be honest, as long as WotC is owned by Hasbro, they shouldn't attempt it. Hasbro has a whole other vision on what are good margins, what is a good product and how many sales a succesful product make.</p><p></p><p>Also, now is not the time to release a large new fantasy miniatures game/line, there's The Hobbit by GW next year and that is going to get a lot of attention.</p><p></p><p>But if there where a Chainmail skirmish game, use things that make the D&D brand 'unique' in the market. Gnolls, monsters, etc.</p><p></p><p>But the need to buy D&D minis has diminished, other manufacturers make excellent miniatures that are very good fits for almost all of the iconic D&D monsters (and some not so iconic monsters). Not to mention the glut of cheap prepainted plastic (nearly indestructible) miniatures that the bowls of WotC spit out over the last few years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cergorach, post: 5478729, member: 725"] Chainmail miniatures never were pre-painted, so I'll leave the pre-painted discussion to another recent thread. I see no reason why WotC would need or want to kick GW on it's behind in the miniatures market. They would be like any other competitor, and instead of taking it's queues from GW it should take it's queues from Privateer Press, they started with a few factions and a limited amount of miniatures to create a skirmish game, over the years it has evolved to a large range with a lot of factions. And battles are getting bigger and bigger. But to be honest, as long as WotC is owned by Hasbro, they shouldn't attempt it. Hasbro has a whole other vision on what are good margins, what is a good product and how many sales a succesful product make. Also, now is not the time to release a large new fantasy miniatures game/line, there's The Hobbit by GW next year and that is going to get a lot of attention. But if there where a Chainmail skirmish game, use things that make the D&D brand 'unique' in the market. Gnolls, monsters, etc. But the need to buy D&D minis has diminished, other manufacturers make excellent miniatures that are very good fits for almost all of the iconic D&D monsters (and some not so iconic monsters). Not to mention the glut of cheap prepainted plastic (nearly indestructible) miniatures that the bowls of WotC spit out over the last few years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should WoTC try again with Chainmail?
Top