Shouldn't ENWorld be ".com"?


log in or register to remove this ad

Yair said:
The point is not whether an organization has buisness aspects to it. The point is whether these aspects are limited by and serve the organization's goals, or whether the organization serves the buisness goals.

Yes and if the lack of business items means that the organization is not meeting it's goals, then you need to reevaluate right?
In the hospital example you state the goal is to provide service to as many people as possible. However you also state that this service is naturally inferior. Therein lies the problem. A hospital that does not concern itself with quality of service is not doing its best. If the only income the hospital has are from donors and the gift shop souvenirs then the hospital is not doing things correctly.
Most hospitals these days have many shops in them that pay rent, as well as cafeterias and such. Around here we have universal healthcare. It has it's own problems, but you don't see hospitals avoiding any means of getting money despite their government funding. They will take whatever money they can get, because they have a goal of providing QUALITY service to as many people as need it. If that means some corporation sponsors them then so be it.
 

enworld.com is owned by a cybersquatter in Tokyo who has no intention of using the domain. The cost to file an ICANN complaint and pull the domain foricibly from him - $3000. Probably not worth it.
 

Remove ads

Top