Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sick of the ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eric Finley" data-source="post: 4918119" data-attributes="member: 83401"><p>Garthanos - I'm sure there are some funky Arcane Initiate (Magic Missile, Wizard's Fury) builds one could do with that.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: RoyalBlue"><em>To readdress the OP...</em></span></p><p></p><p>It sounds to me (reading charitably) like you're primarily trying to change the Ranger to be more <em>interesting</em> to you, rather than worrying strictly about power level. The problem is that they are, to many [and you do not wish to discuss this lemma, a reasonable request], both (a) very powerful and (b) not very interesting or challenging to play.</p><p></p><p>The power comes from multiattacks. So, first step, adopt one of the many proposed fixes for this. The one I just thought of would be pretty straightforward: any melee or ranged attack which makes multiple attack rolls, each doing damage, uses only half static mods for damage. (You <em>do</em> use power cards or some equivalent, don't you?) That includes stat (where applicable), enhancement, temporary boosts, and the rest of the parcel all rolled together.</p><p></p><p>[Some other tweaks may help reduce some of the other problematic aspects as well. In my game I allow the Beast to be enchanted as a magic "weapon" much like Monk Unarmed Strike. This helps boost up the Beastmaster builds to competitiveness. And double weapons are just a cosmetic tweak of two statistical weapons of the appropriate kinds; they have no special weapon entries of their own. An Urugosh is a battleaxe/spear. The feat Double Weapon Fighter grants the Defensive property to such a union of two weapons.]</p><p></p><p>Then, rather than simply removing the Archer Ranger and TWF Ranger class features altogether, give them more interesting ones instead. For example:</p><p></p><p>Archer Ranger - When using magical ammunition, after the battle you recover half of the spent ammunition, and can restore them to their normal enchanted (and functional) status after a short rest. You need not track nonmagical ammunition even if your campaign normally does so. (And we encourage DMs to track nonmagical ammunition for characters other than this one, if one is in play.)</p><p></p><p>TWF Ranger (using my proposed multiattack nerf above) - While wielding two melee weapons, you may make an opportunity attack against an enemy which shifts out of a square you threaten and into another square which you also threaten.</p><p></p><p>The archer one encourages them to play with an item type which otherwise may not see much play, and which will introduce strategic complexity as they look for interesting combos there. The TWF one introduces a defender-y side to the TWFer, and makes them care a fair bit more about tactical positioning. (Not having to care as much about positioning being one of the reasons why some consider them unfun to play compared to, say, a rogue.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eric Finley, post: 4918119, member: 83401"] Garthanos - I'm sure there are some funky Arcane Initiate (Magic Missile, Wizard's Fury) builds one could do with that. [COLOR=RoyalBlue][I]To readdress the OP...[/I][/COLOR] It sounds to me (reading charitably) like you're primarily trying to change the Ranger to be more [I]interesting[/I] to you, rather than worrying strictly about power level. The problem is that they are, to many [and you do not wish to discuss this lemma, a reasonable request], both (a) very powerful and (b) not very interesting or challenging to play. The power comes from multiattacks. So, first step, adopt one of the many proposed fixes for this. The one I just thought of would be pretty straightforward: any melee or ranged attack which makes multiple attack rolls, each doing damage, uses only half static mods for damage. (You [I]do[/I] use power cards or some equivalent, don't you?) That includes stat (where applicable), enhancement, temporary boosts, and the rest of the parcel all rolled together. [Some other tweaks may help reduce some of the other problematic aspects as well. In my game I allow the Beast to be enchanted as a magic "weapon" much like Monk Unarmed Strike. This helps boost up the Beastmaster builds to competitiveness. And double weapons are just a cosmetic tweak of two statistical weapons of the appropriate kinds; they have no special weapon entries of their own. An Urugosh is a battleaxe/spear. The feat Double Weapon Fighter grants the Defensive property to such a union of two weapons.] Then, rather than simply removing the Archer Ranger and TWF Ranger class features altogether, give them more interesting ones instead. For example: Archer Ranger - When using magical ammunition, after the battle you recover half of the spent ammunition, and can restore them to their normal enchanted (and functional) status after a short rest. You need not track nonmagical ammunition even if your campaign normally does so. (And we encourage DMs to track nonmagical ammunition for characters other than this one, if one is in play.) TWF Ranger (using my proposed multiattack nerf above) - While wielding two melee weapons, you may make an opportunity attack against an enemy which shifts out of a square you threaten and into another square which you also threaten. The archer one encourages them to play with an item type which otherwise may not see much play, and which will introduce strategic complexity as they look for interesting combos there. The TWF one introduces a defender-y side to the TWFer, and makes them care a fair bit more about tactical positioning. (Not having to care as much about positioning being one of the reasons why some consider them unfun to play compared to, say, a rogue.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sick of the ranger
Top