Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Sight unseen - what are your plans for 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 3704557" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>Pretty much exactly where I'm at. </p><p></p><p>I've gotten seriously tired of the complexity of all the additional rules for D&D. At the same time, there are many concepts (Shadowcasters, Binders, various "complete" classes, PHB2 feats, other bits and pieces) that I really want to include. The end result is that I either allow 5,000 pages of rules or I weed through that many pages and write a coherent doc detailing my inclusions/exclusions. Of course, I could just use core, but why not use some of the more interesting ideas?</p><p></p><p>Truth told, I was having a conversation this weekend with my wife about which 3E books I wanted to sell/pitch to reduce my potential rules bloat. Bo9S was pretty high on the list, other than having a player using a Swordsage, which doesn't incline me to believe that I'm going to care for some changes in 4E.</p><p></p><p>If 4E is either more flexible in allowing expanded concepts, <u>significantly</u> reduces my prep time, or (preferrably) both, I'll be switching. If the chargen is usable offline and is good, that would be a huge motivation to switch. I generally feel that online-only chargen is a bad platform. They're free to change my mind, but it's going to have to be pretty freakin' good to do that.</p><p></p><p>The only sure killer that I can think of is if the classic magic system (wizards, clerics, etc.) gets turned into a "per encounter" mechanism in any way, shape, or form. Making wizards more Bo9S is one of the few things of which I can think that would make the system worse. Beyond that, it'll come down to an actual evaluation of the specific changes. </p><p></p><p>Odd rant aside, the announcement of 4E comes at an extremely good time for me. I'll pick up the PHB in May and start looking it over. I fully expect that my current game will be over by July (if it doesn't implode due to weight of paperwork beforehand). I was not intending to continue with 3E after that, anyway (paperwork/prep time). So, I'll know what I want to do about the time 4E rolls out. If I'm lucky, I'll even have a chance to run a short nWoD chronicle beforehand and see what the group is interested in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 3704557, member: 5100"] Pretty much exactly where I'm at. I've gotten seriously tired of the complexity of all the additional rules for D&D. At the same time, there are many concepts (Shadowcasters, Binders, various "complete" classes, PHB2 feats, other bits and pieces) that I really want to include. The end result is that I either allow 5,000 pages of rules or I weed through that many pages and write a coherent doc detailing my inclusions/exclusions. Of course, I could just use core, but why not use some of the more interesting ideas? Truth told, I was having a conversation this weekend with my wife about which 3E books I wanted to sell/pitch to reduce my potential rules bloat. Bo9S was pretty high on the list, other than having a player using a Swordsage, which doesn't incline me to believe that I'm going to care for some changes in 4E. If 4E is either more flexible in allowing expanded concepts, [u]significantly[/u] reduces my prep time, or (preferrably) both, I'll be switching. If the chargen is usable offline and is good, that would be a huge motivation to switch. I generally feel that online-only chargen is a bad platform. They're free to change my mind, but it's going to have to be pretty freakin' good to do that. The only sure killer that I can think of is if the classic magic system (wizards, clerics, etc.) gets turned into a "per encounter" mechanism in any way, shape, or form. Making wizards more Bo9S is one of the few things of which I can think that would make the system worse. Beyond that, it'll come down to an actual evaluation of the specific changes. Odd rant aside, the announcement of 4E comes at an extremely good time for me. I'll pick up the PHB in May and start looking it over. I fully expect that my current game will be over by July (if it doesn't implode due to weight of paperwork beforehand). I was not intending to continue with 3E after that, anyway (paperwork/prep time). So, I'll know what I want to do about the time 4E rolls out. If I'm lucky, I'll even have a chance to run a short nWoD chronicle beforehand and see what the group is interested in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Sight unseen - what are your plans for 4E?
Top