Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AdmundfortGeographer" data-source="post: 5033754" data-attributes="member: 4682">I like seeing folks signatures . . . usually. Heck, I even have one. Because along will come someone who tosses handfuls of lines of text, or over does multicoloring. Or they plug in a largish image.Alone that's not a big deal, but it makes me reach to the switch to disable all signatures when one of those folks ends up posting more than a half-dozen times or more per page of a thread. I don't want any authoritarian micromanaging rule that limits how many lines can be used or the size of images in signatures. But how about a middle ground option that can be turned on that prevents every instance of signatures-per-page after the first use of the signature on a page.Until then, I've turned off signatures again. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="AdmundfortGeographer, post: 5033754, member: 4682"] I like seeing folks signatures . . . usually. Heck, I even have one. Because along will come someone who tosses handfuls of lines of text, or over does multicoloring. Or they plug in a largish image. Alone that's not a big deal, but it makes me reach to the switch to disable all signatures when one of those folks ends up posting more than a half-dozen times or more per page of a thread. I don't want any authoritarian micromanaging rule that limits how many lines can be used or the size of images in signatures. But how about a middle ground option that can be turned on that prevents every instance of signatures-per-page after the first use of the signature on a page. Until then, I've turned off signatures again. :( [/QUOTE]

Verification