Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Silly economics of DnD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 385670" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>No. I'm starting from the premise of skill points. Since there is obviously a misunderstanding, I'll attempt to clarify my position.</p><p></p><p>1. A peasant has, on average, 12 skill points.</p><p>2. He therefore has 12 skill points 'worth' of skills.</p><p>3. Given that he has to use the 12 skill points, we have to ask ourselves which it is most likely that he will have skill points in. I have discussed the other possible skills that he would have them in, and it is fair to assume that he puts some skills into Craft and/or Profession.</p><p>4. Thus, he has Craft/Profession skills.</p><p></p><p>The problem is not in the assigning of the skill points, but in the assumption that there are skill points to assign. I will freely admit that the average medieval peasant did not have 'skill points': an accurate model would give him far fewer than twelve (and make him illiterate, but that's another topic). The problem is not the 'automagic' assignment of skills, but the 'automagic' having of skills (and literacy) which I believe to be inaccurate.</p><p></p><p>Of course, even if the peasant doesn't have Craft skills, then his default nets him more than five times his usual wage, even using improvised tools. Why would he not therefore do this?</p><p></p><p>Though, if this still doesn't convince you, I hold to my unassailable point that even 'skilled' professions do not get their dues in the DMG. The cook earns 1 sp, and since Profession [Cook] can't be used untrained, it is the minimum that (s)he has one skill point in it. Given a seven-day week (most likely for cooks) and taking the Profession earnings guide, the only way to vaguely reconcile the two would mean she has an average check result of between 1 and 2. Unless the typical cook has a Wisdom of 1 and is furthered cursed with a -4 to skills, taking 10 will yield more than a check result of 2.</p><p></p><p>I know that the PHB figures are 'guidelines' to PCs, but is it really right/accurate that PCs should earn manifold that of an NPC for exactly the same job. Of course not. However, since the equipment lists are presumably made in mind to the low DMG wages, the better way of reconciling the two may be to divide the Craft/Profession earnings by five. Or times the DMG wages by five, if you prefer. But clearly at the current the two are irreconcilable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 385670, member: 2486"] No. I'm starting from the premise of skill points. Since there is obviously a misunderstanding, I'll attempt to clarify my position. 1. A peasant has, on average, 12 skill points. 2. He therefore has 12 skill points 'worth' of skills. 3. Given that he has to use the 12 skill points, we have to ask ourselves which it is most likely that he will have skill points in. I have discussed the other possible skills that he would have them in, and it is fair to assume that he puts some skills into Craft and/or Profession. 4. Thus, he has Craft/Profession skills. The problem is not in the assigning of the skill points, but in the assumption that there are skill points to assign. I will freely admit that the average medieval peasant did not have 'skill points': an accurate model would give him far fewer than twelve (and make him illiterate, but that's another topic). The problem is not the 'automagic' assignment of skills, but the 'automagic' having of skills (and literacy) which I believe to be inaccurate. Of course, even if the peasant doesn't have Craft skills, then his default nets him more than five times his usual wage, even using improvised tools. Why would he not therefore do this? Though, if this still doesn't convince you, I hold to my unassailable point that even 'skilled' professions do not get their dues in the DMG. The cook earns 1 sp, and since Profession [Cook] can't be used untrained, it is the minimum that (s)he has one skill point in it. Given a seven-day week (most likely for cooks) and taking the Profession earnings guide, the only way to vaguely reconcile the two would mean she has an average check result of between 1 and 2. Unless the typical cook has a Wisdom of 1 and is furthered cursed with a -4 to skills, taking 10 will yield more than a check result of 2. I know that the PHB figures are 'guidelines' to PCs, but is it really right/accurate that PCs should earn manifold that of an NPC for exactly the same job. Of course not. However, since the equipment lists are presumably made in mind to the low DMG wages, the better way of reconciling the two may be to divide the Craft/Profession earnings by five. Or times the DMG wages by five, if you prefer. But clearly at the current the two are irreconcilable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Silly economics of DnD
Top