Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Silly/Senseless Rules You Have Found
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SilverfireSage" data-source="post: 6412351" data-attributes="member: 6778313"><p>Except in reality what you would have is one of two things: A blank list like in 3.5</p><p></p><p>Skills</p><p>Perception</p><p>Acrobatics</p><p>Tools: ____________</p><p>_________________</p><p>__________________</p><p>__________________</p><p>Lock picking</p><p>Healing kit (not sure why this is here anyway, did you mash it with medicine?)</p><p></p><p>This is cumbersome, and takes up space that isn't needed on the character sheet. The other way would be to just list each one individually, but again, that takes up unneeded space and crowds up the skills. </p><p>Tools and skills are separated for one simple reason that I've stated before and Tormyr stated above me: tools require something, skills do not. All of the tools require you to have a specific device or object to work. You cannot pick a lock without Thieves tools. Period. Skills are something that absolutely everyone can do with varying degrees of success. Anyone can try to climb a wall or try to be sneaky, or try to remember the location of something. That's why they are bundled together and tools are not. This is why I think the proficiency system is so elegantly designed. You can simply have a section at the end where all of your proficiency's go, and each character can list which ones they have and which ones they don't. The reason they don't do that with skills as well is because of the "out of sight, out of mind" philosophy. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, yeah, 90% of things in D&D are just short cuts to actual things. If they went through and outlined every single nitty gritty little detail, sure, some people might like it, but the vast, vast majority would find it too cumbersome to work with. If you want, you can just say heavy armor encumbers you more and be done with it if it bothers you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except when they play tested, most people enjoyed having an attack cantrip that they could use all the time. It hearkens back to the 3.5 and older days, where a wizard at level 1 takes just a few rounds to run out of spells and is forced to twiddle his thumbs or take pot shots with a cross bow. Endless cantrips make the wizards still feel like wizards even in normal combat, and lets them be viable all the time. I see no problem with that at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SilverfireSage, post: 6412351, member: 6778313"] Except in reality what you would have is one of two things: A blank list like in 3.5 Skills Perception Acrobatics Tools: ____________ _________________ __________________ __________________ Lock picking Healing kit (not sure why this is here anyway, did you mash it with medicine?) This is cumbersome, and takes up space that isn't needed on the character sheet. The other way would be to just list each one individually, but again, that takes up unneeded space and crowds up the skills. Tools and skills are separated for one simple reason that I've stated before and Tormyr stated above me: tools require something, skills do not. All of the tools require you to have a specific device or object to work. You cannot pick a lock without Thieves tools. Period. Skills are something that absolutely everyone can do with varying degrees of success. Anyone can try to climb a wall or try to be sneaky, or try to remember the location of something. That's why they are bundled together and tools are not. This is why I think the proficiency system is so elegantly designed. You can simply have a section at the end where all of your proficiency's go, and each character can list which ones they have and which ones they don't. The reason they don't do that with skills as well is because of the "out of sight, out of mind" philosophy. Well, yeah, 90% of things in D&D are just short cuts to actual things. If they went through and outlined every single nitty gritty little detail, sure, some people might like it, but the vast, vast majority would find it too cumbersome to work with. If you want, you can just say heavy armor encumbers you more and be done with it if it bothers you. Except when they play tested, most people enjoyed having an attack cantrip that they could use all the time. It hearkens back to the 3.5 and older days, where a wizard at level 1 takes just a few rounds to run out of spells and is forced to twiddle his thumbs or take pot shots with a cross bow. Endless cantrips make the wizards still feel like wizards even in normal combat, and lets them be viable all the time. I see no problem with that at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Silly/Senseless Rules You Have Found
Top