Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Siloing" Class Abilities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merlion" data-source="post: 3747978" data-attributes="member: 10397"><p>I would love this to death, as the AE/AU magic system is probably my favorite of all systems I have seen in games. However, they have stated that Vancian magic will still be in, but that it will no longer be all that a wizard has. This implies, to me, that the actual spellcasting will still work the same as ever, or at least still be basically the Vancian fire and forget system, but that Wizards are now basically going to have limited-use supernatural or spell like abilities as well. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, like has been mentioned, this is basically the oposite of what they are trying to do. They don't want you to have to always choose to be good at one thing and suck at or be incapable of another anymore. They don't want a wizard to have to either not have enough combat spells to contribute to combat throughout, or not have the spells to help in non combat situations either.</p><p></p><p> The trick of course is balancing it. I'm all for the concept, but if its taken too far it will simply make challenges unchallenging.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p> I agree. Also, he didn't seem to be talking about an increase in the versatility of spells. He seemed to be talking about either a difference in how spells or stored, or could simply have been referencing the fact that since Wizards will apparently have magical abilities other than just their spells, what spells they prepare will be less important.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p> This is a definite possibility. However, I think having multiple sets of slots would be a bookeeping nightmare, so I hope they don't go that route. I've played a highish level wizard, and keeping track of one set of slots is bad enough.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> I think we are missing some critical piece of this. We don't know enough yet about the non-spell magical abilities wizards are being given, nor about this whole business of "per day" and "per encounter" and wether it applies to prepared spells or only to the other abilities.</p><p></p><p> But it sounds to me as though a Wizard may be able to prepare multiple spells in a slot, or perhaps some spells have become abilities wizards can use in other ways, thus freeing up spell slots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merlion, post: 3747978, member: 10397"] I would love this to death, as the AE/AU magic system is probably my favorite of all systems I have seen in games. However, they have stated that Vancian magic will still be in, but that it will no longer be all that a wizard has. This implies, to me, that the actual spellcasting will still work the same as ever, or at least still be basically the Vancian fire and forget system, but that Wizards are now basically going to have limited-use supernatural or spell like abilities as well. Well, like has been mentioned, this is basically the oposite of what they are trying to do. They don't want you to have to always choose to be good at one thing and suck at or be incapable of another anymore. They don't want a wizard to have to either not have enough combat spells to contribute to combat throughout, or not have the spells to help in non combat situations either. The trick of course is balancing it. I'm all for the concept, but if its taken too far it will simply make challenges unchallenging. I agree. Also, he didn't seem to be talking about an increase in the versatility of spells. He seemed to be talking about either a difference in how spells or stored, or could simply have been referencing the fact that since Wizards will apparently have magical abilities other than just their spells, what spells they prepare will be less important. This is a definite possibility. However, I think having multiple sets of slots would be a bookeeping nightmare, so I hope they don't go that route. I've played a highish level wizard, and keeping track of one set of slots is bad enough. I think we are missing some critical piece of this. We don't know enough yet about the non-spell magical abilities wizards are being given, nor about this whole business of "per day" and "per encounter" and wether it applies to prepared spells or only to the other abilities. But it sounds to me as though a Wizard may be able to prepare multiple spells in a slot, or perhaps some spells have become abilities wizards can use in other ways, thus freeing up spell slots. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Siloing" Class Abilities
Top