Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Simple, Gritty,Modern. Unpopular Opinions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9605199" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Ranking individual things makes the most sense when you have a bunch of at least theoretical peers, all competing for the top spot--the specific intent of a tournament or a competitive sport season is to win the grand prize/cup/bowl/etc., so there <em>will</em> ultimately be a single winner.</p><p></p><p>For things where there are a large number of options and none is necessarily "the very best", bands/categories/tiers are much, much more common and fitting, because something being A-tier doesn't mean it's strictly better than B-tier, for example, but rather that it has more "going for it" than the thing in B-tier. You see the exact same sort of thing in all sorts of charop guides, just using colors instead of labelled tiers (in 4e, most guides used gold/teal/blue/black/purple/red to range from "unless you simply can't, you MUST take this" down to "absolutely avoid this at all costs unless you simply can't"; in 5e guides, it's usually a rainbow scheme, generally with blue/purple being the best and orange/red being the worst.)</p><p></p><p>Because, as an example, <em>fireball</em> is a strong offensive spell, but that doesn't mean it fits on a clean one-by-one hierarchy where <em>fire storm</em> is specifically #12, <em>fireball</em> is specifically #11, and <em>flaming sphere</em> is specifically #10. There are too many different benefits, too many different metrics, to make a single well-ordered numbered sequence. But if, for example, comparing subclasses? It's almost certainly not truly accurate to say that X subclass is the first, Y is the second, Z is the third, etc. Instead, you'd say that (frex) of 5.0 Barbarian subclasses, Totem and Beast are both good but for different reasons, while Berserker is absolutely crap and should be avoided at all costs. That's how you capture things like "different people want different things and have different priorities", while still recognizing that some designs are just really awful while others are good or even great.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9605199, member: 6790260"] Ranking individual things makes the most sense when you have a bunch of at least theoretical peers, all competing for the top spot--the specific intent of a tournament or a competitive sport season is to win the grand prize/cup/bowl/etc., so there [I]will[/I] ultimately be a single winner. For things where there are a large number of options and none is necessarily "the very best", bands/categories/tiers are much, much more common and fitting, because something being A-tier doesn't mean it's strictly better than B-tier, for example, but rather that it has more "going for it" than the thing in B-tier. You see the exact same sort of thing in all sorts of charop guides, just using colors instead of labelled tiers (in 4e, most guides used gold/teal/blue/black/purple/red to range from "unless you simply can't, you MUST take this" down to "absolutely avoid this at all costs unless you simply can't"; in 5e guides, it's usually a rainbow scheme, generally with blue/purple being the best and orange/red being the worst.) Because, as an example, [I]fireball[/I] is a strong offensive spell, but that doesn't mean it fits on a clean one-by-one hierarchy where [I]fire storm[/I] is specifically #12, [I]fireball[/I] is specifically #11, and [I]flaming sphere[/I] is specifically #10. There are too many different benefits, too many different metrics, to make a single well-ordered numbered sequence. But if, for example, comparing subclasses? It's almost certainly not truly accurate to say that X subclass is the first, Y is the second, Z is the third, etc. Instead, you'd say that (frex) of 5.0 Barbarian subclasses, Totem and Beast are both good but for different reasons, while Berserker is absolutely crap and should be avoided at all costs. That's how you capture things like "different people want different things and have different priorities", while still recognizing that some designs are just really awful while others are good or even great. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Simple, Gritty,Modern. Unpopular Opinions
Top