Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Simple Skill Challenge Fix - The 1:1 System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Hitcher" data-source="post: 4283258" data-attributes="member: 63747"><p>Okay, this may not fix the skill challenge maths in as much detail as say, Stalker0's system (<a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=229796)" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=229796)</a>, but it's a lot simpler:</p><p></p><p>Simply set the Success/Failure ratio for ALL skill challenges at 1:1. ie. 3 successes before 3 failures, or 5 successes before 5 failures etc. XP rewards should then be set based on the relative DC of the challenge, rather than the Complexity.</p><p></p><p>Leave all other rules as written in the DMG.</p><p></p><p>This way, an average skill challenge for reasonably skilled characters will tend to succeed approximately 50% of the time, or about as easily as an average Skill Check. </p><p></p><p>Higher Complexity ratings will create more complex role-playing scenes, while making very little difference to overall difficulty (which actually seems to be the intent of the rules), while difficulty can easily be managed roll-to-roll by making small adjustments to DC. Enterprising players can also improve their odds dramatically by finding ways to get sundry +2 bonuses, without things getting ridiculously easy.</p><p></p><p>Having two separately adjustable variables in the system (Complexity and DC) may seem to offer more flexibility, but in the end it tends to create confusion. A similar issue was one of the main reasons that White Wolf updated the central ruleset of their World of Darkness games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Hitcher, post: 4283258, member: 63747"] Okay, this may not fix the skill challenge maths in as much detail as say, Stalker0's system ([url]http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=229796)[/url], but it's a lot simpler: Simply set the Success/Failure ratio for ALL skill challenges at 1:1. ie. 3 successes before 3 failures, or 5 successes before 5 failures etc. XP rewards should then be set based on the relative DC of the challenge, rather than the Complexity. Leave all other rules as written in the DMG. This way, an average skill challenge for reasonably skilled characters will tend to succeed approximately 50% of the time, or about as easily as an average Skill Check. Higher Complexity ratings will create more complex role-playing scenes, while making very little difference to overall difficulty (which actually seems to be the intent of the rules), while difficulty can easily be managed roll-to-roll by making small adjustments to DC. Enterprising players can also improve their odds dramatically by finding ways to get sundry +2 bonuses, without things getting ridiculously easy. Having two separately adjustable variables in the system (Complexity and DC) may seem to offer more flexibility, but in the end it tends to create confusion. A similar issue was one of the main reasons that White Wolf updated the central ruleset of their World of Darkness games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Simple Skill Challenge Fix - The 1:1 System
Top