Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Simplified Player's Handbook"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Funksaw" data-source="post: 2418179" data-attributes="member: 20181"><p>Well, I was thinking about a product that tries to offer what the PHB offers, but in a much less complex forms. I wouldn't "cut" anything, but I'd simplify skill selection (Instead of class/cross-class, just give bonuses in certain skills at each level of a class, and let your "free" skills be equal to your int bonus) </p><p></p><p>I'd simply spellcasting (Your mana pool is equal to 3x your combined levels in casting classes, and spells cost their "spell-level" to cast. (A 3rd level wizard could cast 3 third level spells, 6 second levels, 9 first levels, or any combination thereof...) Instead of saying "This is a 3rd level Druid spell, but a 5th level Cleric spell," why not just say that the spells have prerequisites (Druids only, 2 levels in Cleric required, 3 levels of Bard OR one level of wizard...) and, most importantly, fewer redundant spells. (At the end of the day, a Fireball and a lightning bolt differ only in details - they're both damage-dealing spells.) </p><p></p><p>I'd also simplify feats - no 'reduced penalty' in stages, like Ambidextrous/Two-Weapon Fighting/Improved Two Weapon Fighting... if you don't have the feat, it's -4, -6 to use two weapons. If you do, you don't have a penalty at all. Why bother with having to memorize all those numbers? I'd eliminate +2/+2 feats, and just remove the cap on skills. </p><p></p><p>So you <em>can</em> keep all the features from D&D - skills, saves, hp, classes, levels, monsters, feats, spells - you just shake out the cruft. </p><p></p><p>----</p><p></p><p>The question is: Who is this written for? Well, quite frankly, it's written for the guy who just wants a beer and pretzles game that everyone knows. I mean, D&D makes a GREAT beer and pretzels game if it wasn't for all the stupid math. But actual marketed beer and pretzles games, you need to learn a new system for pretty much all of them. So, if you simplify the system you can just relax and have fun instead of having to pick through all the rules, while still getting that D&D experience. </p><p></p><p>It's what I'd hope 4th to be, but from Dancey's comments, it looks like they're going to go in the other direction.</p><p></p><p>Although that might be a thought - going in the *other* direction from C&C or True 20 to recreate D&D...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Funksaw, post: 2418179, member: 20181"] Well, I was thinking about a product that tries to offer what the PHB offers, but in a much less complex forms. I wouldn't "cut" anything, but I'd simplify skill selection (Instead of class/cross-class, just give bonuses in certain skills at each level of a class, and let your "free" skills be equal to your int bonus) I'd simply spellcasting (Your mana pool is equal to 3x your combined levels in casting classes, and spells cost their "spell-level" to cast. (A 3rd level wizard could cast 3 third level spells, 6 second levels, 9 first levels, or any combination thereof...) Instead of saying "This is a 3rd level Druid spell, but a 5th level Cleric spell," why not just say that the spells have prerequisites (Druids only, 2 levels in Cleric required, 3 levels of Bard OR one level of wizard...) and, most importantly, fewer redundant spells. (At the end of the day, a Fireball and a lightning bolt differ only in details - they're both damage-dealing spells.) I'd also simplify feats - no 'reduced penalty' in stages, like Ambidextrous/Two-Weapon Fighting/Improved Two Weapon Fighting... if you don't have the feat, it's -4, -6 to use two weapons. If you do, you don't have a penalty at all. Why bother with having to memorize all those numbers? I'd eliminate +2/+2 feats, and just remove the cap on skills. So you [i]can[/i] keep all the features from D&D - skills, saves, hp, classes, levels, monsters, feats, spells - you just shake out the cruft. ---- The question is: Who is this written for? Well, quite frankly, it's written for the guy who just wants a beer and pretzles game that everyone knows. I mean, D&D makes a GREAT beer and pretzels game if it wasn't for all the stupid math. But actual marketed beer and pretzles games, you need to learn a new system for pretty much all of them. So, if you simplify the system you can just relax and have fun instead of having to pick through all the rules, while still getting that D&D experience. It's what I'd hope 4th to be, but from Dancey's comments, it looks like they're going to go in the other direction. Although that might be a thought - going in the *other* direction from C&C or True 20 to recreate D&D... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Simplified Player's Handbook"
Top