Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Xeviat" data-source="post: 6929919" data-attributes="member: 57494">See, I want everyone to be reasonable everywhere. One character may have less options in combat, but as long as those options are as good as the others, it should be fine.I don't like 1 role per class because I want class to mean something in the world. I want to be able to see a character and say "that's a wizard".I think each class should handle combat differently, and have some unique mechanic to how they do things.Barbarians rage: this offers some kind of trade off. Do I give in and rage now? Or do I hold onto my senses and wait?Bards: inspiration, boosts allies capability while still doing their own actions. Could be protective or offensive.Cleric: channel divinity offers limited dual role/classing. War cleric is kind of like a fighter, sun cleric is kind of a wizard.Druid: wildshape allows Druids to change their role on the fly.Fighter: master of martial combat, they have more maneuvers than other warriors.Monk: my thought is stances to dance in and out of, allowing them to play with a flow of abilities.Paladin: divine challenge, the paladin excels a fighting a single opponent (whether it is to lock them down from hurting others, or to kill them faster).Ranger: rangers fight in tandem with their pets, controlling two units as one (for those that don't want pets, I could see a small bird as a passive, non-unit, pet).Rogue: rogues fight with trickery, going after vulnerable targets. I'd love to see rogues have to spend actions setting up devastating attacks or setting up their allies (for lazylords).Sorcerer: becoming more and more like your bloodline, sorcerers will have lots of unique magical abilities at will, more so than a wizard's cantrips.Warlocks: curse, maybe allowing one curse per round, slowly debilitating everyone. Ultimate in multi targeting?Wizard: master of arcane, simply more spells than everyone else.Something like this changes up playstyles for each class. A leader fighter (warlord) is going to be different from a leader rogue (noble?) or a leader cleric (healer) or a leader wizard (abjurer?).Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</blockquote>

Verification