Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Simulation vs Game - Where should D&D 5e aim?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6300231" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I agree with both points, although personally I really don't like the adventure path style.</p><p></p><p>What does this mean?</p><p></p><p>I can absolutely describe a 100% objectively-existing computer using the following sentence: "The computer currently in front of me, the keyboard of which I am typing these words on." Yet that sentence has three speaker-relative referring terms ("me", "I" and "these words").</p><p></p><p>I can tell you the time where I am - 7.27 in the evening - and that is objective, too, even though the clock of someone moving past me at a very high speed might give a different reading as they watch me type these words.</p><p></p><p>This sentence is incoherent.</p><p></p><p>Within the gameworld, the giant has no level and is neither a minion nor a solo. It is a giant. The people who look at it - the inhabitants of the gameworld - can see it, and can see what it is capable of.</p><p></p><p>The people who describe it as a level 25 minion or a level 7 solo are the players. They do not see any giants. In fact, they know that no giants exist, and that the whole gameworld is just made up. And they absolutely can represent elements of the gameworld using sometimes one mechanic, sometimes another. All you need is a translation schema, which I and [MENTION=27160]Balesir[/MENTION] have already both explained upthread.</p><p></p><p>If you want an analogy, consider the Battlesystem mechanics that Mearls recently described in L&L. In that system, the mechanical representation of an orc changes depending on the purpose for which it is represented - one-on-one fighting, or unit-vs-unit fighting. That doesn't mean that the orc in the fiction is changing in some fashion, or ceases to have an objective existence (relative to the fiction).</p><p></p><p>When the giant is fighting level 7 PCs, the best mechanical way to give expression to its capabilities is as a level 7 solo. When the giant is fighting 25th level PCs, the best mechanical way to give expression to it capabilities is as a level 25 minion. The giant hasn't changed. The fiction hasn't changed. Only the mechanics are different. Just like Battlesystem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6300231, member: 42582"] I agree with both points, although personally I really don't like the adventure path style. What does this mean? I can absolutely describe a 100% objectively-existing computer using the following sentence: "The computer currently in front of me, the keyboard of which I am typing these words on." Yet that sentence has three speaker-relative referring terms ("me", "I" and "these words"). I can tell you the time where I am - 7.27 in the evening - and that is objective, too, even though the clock of someone moving past me at a very high speed might give a different reading as they watch me type these words. This sentence is incoherent. Within the gameworld, the giant has no level and is neither a minion nor a solo. It is a giant. The people who look at it - the inhabitants of the gameworld - can see it, and can see what it is capable of. The people who describe it as a level 25 minion or a level 7 solo are the players. They do not see any giants. In fact, they know that no giants exist, and that the whole gameworld is just made up. And they absolutely can represent elements of the gameworld using sometimes one mechanic, sometimes another. All you need is a translation schema, which I and [MENTION=27160]Balesir[/MENTION] have already both explained upthread. If you want an analogy, consider the Battlesystem mechanics that Mearls recently described in L&L. In that system, the mechanical representation of an orc changes depending on the purpose for which it is represented - one-on-one fighting, or unit-vs-unit fighting. That doesn't mean that the orc in the fiction is changing in some fashion, or ceases to have an objective existence (relative to the fiction). When the giant is fighting level 7 PCs, the best mechanical way to give expression to its capabilities is as a level 7 solo. When the giant is fighting 25th level PCs, the best mechanical way to give expression to it capabilities is as a level 25 minion. The giant hasn't changed. The fiction hasn't changed. Only the mechanics are different. Just like Battlesystem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Simulation vs Game - Where should D&D 5e aim?
Top