Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
Playing the Game
Story Hour
Sins of Our Fathers - 2/10 - Final Update
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lela" data-source="post: 1210726" data-attributes="member: 1216"><p>I've read a lot of Story Hour's (you once even termed me a professoinal SH reader) and, while thinking about your worries about dark posts, I've put something together.</p><p> </p><p> Several others have said that that's much of the reason they read your work. In fact, that's exactly it. People read your work partly because of the grittiness and, dare I say it, gore. Others read P-Kitty partly because of the high level and mix of log/story style. Old One for high level feeling at low levels, Sep for philisophical conflicts, or Wulf for hack'n slash action. While there are billions of other reasons to read these Story Hours (I could write an essay on any of them and tons of others; I have in some cases), people show up for specific reasons.</p><p> </p><p> This means that they're showing up for your style (or some facit thereof) and others can have different areas. Don't try to change your style to match someone elses or even avoid someone else's. Take only the critisim you feel works witth your stile to heart and ignore the rest. If it's a deal breaker for them, so what? They can find a niche they like somewhere else (I might have a recomendation or 4 for anyone interested).</p><p> </p><p> There's another side to this though. If you don't feel comfortable talking about aspects you, personally, consider blood, urine, and anal spearing too much then don't write about it. If a reader is really looking for that, someone else, somewhere, will have it. All you need to do is write what you feel like writing. It's up to the reader to decide if he likes it. No one's forcing him to read it.</p><p> </p><p> Of course, since things are never simple, there's a thrid side to this. If you want critisim (and it seems you do) then go ahead and ask for it. Those posting know you don't have to take it to heart. They're here already and trust you to do what's best for both the story itself and your desire as an artist.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> Ready for a small paradox? By the logic of the post above, you don't have to take what I said to heart. Of course, if you choose to completely reject it, you must take it to heart. By taking it to heart you can choose to reject it. . .</p><p> </p><p> Remember that we're already here. You don't have to win us over. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lela, post: 1210726, member: 1216"] I've read a lot of Story Hour's (you once even termed me a professoinal SH reader) and, while thinking about your worries about dark posts, I've put something together. Several others have said that that's much of the reason they read your work. In fact, that's exactly it. People read your work partly because of the grittiness and, dare I say it, gore. Others read P-Kitty partly because of the high level and mix of log/story style. Old One for high level feeling at low levels, Sep for philisophical conflicts, or Wulf for hack'n slash action. While there are billions of other reasons to read these Story Hours (I could write an essay on any of them and tons of others; I have in some cases), people show up for specific reasons. This means that they're showing up for your style (or some facit thereof) and others can have different areas. Don't try to change your style to match someone elses or even avoid someone else's. Take only the critisim you feel works witth your stile to heart and ignore the rest. If it's a deal breaker for them, so what? They can find a niche they like somewhere else (I might have a recomendation or 4 for anyone interested). There's another side to this though. If you don't feel comfortable talking about aspects you, personally, consider blood, urine, and anal spearing too much then don't write about it. If a reader is really looking for that, someone else, somewhere, will have it. All you need to do is write what you feel like writing. It's up to the reader to decide if he likes it. No one's forcing him to read it. Of course, since things are never simple, there's a thrid side to this. If you want critisim (and it seems you do) then go ahead and ask for it. Those posting know you don't have to take it to heart. They're here already and trust you to do what's best for both the story itself and your desire as an artist. Ready for a small paradox? By the logic of the post above, you don't have to take what I said to heart. Of course, if you choose to completely reject it, you must take it to heart. By taking it to heart you can choose to reject it. . . Remember that we're already here. You don't have to win us over. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Story Hour
Sins of Our Fathers - 2/10 - Final Update
Top