Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Size bonus to AC - drop it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tequila Sunrise" data-source="post: 4539132" data-attributes="member: 40398"><p>Aha, we've gotten to the crux of the issue! The idea that Medium size is the logical baseline for size mods is what I've been trying to get at. You say it makes sense, but why? It's easy to fall into this trap because most PC races happen to fall into the Medium category, but that doesn't make the 4'-8' range significant in any mathematical way. Let me make an analogy:</p><p></p><p>I tell you that I'm going to DM a seafaring campaign and that I've made basic stats for a range of ships, including 'super ships' that are larger than anything in the real world. I then show you the stats. Looking over them, you see that:</p><p></p><p>Size I ships are 4'-8' long and have an AB and AC mod of +8.</p><p>Size II ships are 8'-16' long and have an AB and AC mod of +4.</p><p>Size III ships are 16'-32' long and have an AB and AC mod of +2.</p><p>Size IV ships are 32'-64' long and have an AB and AC mod of +1.</p><p>Size V ships are 64'-128' long and have an AB and AC mod of +0.</p><p>Size VI ships are 128'-256' long and have an AB and AC mod of -1.</p><p>Size VII ships are 256'-512' long and have an AB and AC mod of -2.</p><p>Size VIII ships are 512'-1,024' long and have an AB and AC mod of -4.</p><p>Size IX ships are 1,024'-2,048' long and have an AB and AC mod of -8.</p><p></p><p>As you can see, each size category is exactly double the length of the previous category. Therefore you would logically think that I would either assign each category a flat linear bonus, or I would assign each category an exponentially increasing bonus that begins with Size I. But I didn't; I arbitrarily assigned Size V as my baseline and then assigned exponential bonuses to either extreme of it. Why? The largest ships in real world history happen to fall within Size V, but that doesn't make that category mathematically significant.</p><p></p><p>See where I'm going with this analogy? Medium size seems like a good baseline for size mods because we happen to be Medium creatures and because the word 'medium' implies baseline-ness, but using Medium as a mathematical baseline is as nonsensical as me choosing Size V ships as a baseline. If any size category is used as a mathematical baseline, it should be Tiny because Tiny is closest to zero mass. Assigning Medium as the baseline for size mods is effectively saying "In D&D, the laws of physics have decided that creatures 4' to 8' are special." Not that the laws of physics are the same in D&D as they are in real life, but in such cases they have been changed for the sake of simplicity and expediency. In the case of size mods, D&D's laws of physics are neither simple nor expedient.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do titanic creatures get -16 to attack and AC?</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's an admirable goal. 3e isn't my preferred rule set, but I respect anyone who puts a significant amount of effort into any rule set.</p><p></p><p>TS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tequila Sunrise, post: 4539132, member: 40398"] Aha, we've gotten to the crux of the issue! The idea that Medium size is the logical baseline for size mods is what I've been trying to get at. You say it makes sense, but why? It's easy to fall into this trap because most PC races happen to fall into the Medium category, but that doesn't make the 4'-8' range significant in any mathematical way. Let me make an analogy: I tell you that I'm going to DM a seafaring campaign and that I've made basic stats for a range of ships, including 'super ships' that are larger than anything in the real world. I then show you the stats. Looking over them, you see that: Size I ships are 4'-8' long and have an AB and AC mod of +8. Size II ships are 8'-16' long and have an AB and AC mod of +4. Size III ships are 16'-32' long and have an AB and AC mod of +2. Size IV ships are 32'-64' long and have an AB and AC mod of +1. Size V ships are 64'-128' long and have an AB and AC mod of +0. Size VI ships are 128'-256' long and have an AB and AC mod of -1. Size VII ships are 256'-512' long and have an AB and AC mod of -2. Size VIII ships are 512'-1,024' long and have an AB and AC mod of -4. Size IX ships are 1,024'-2,048' long and have an AB and AC mod of -8. As you can see, each size category is exactly double the length of the previous category. Therefore you would logically think that I would either assign each category a flat linear bonus, or I would assign each category an exponentially increasing bonus that begins with Size I. But I didn't; I arbitrarily assigned Size V as my baseline and then assigned exponential bonuses to either extreme of it. Why? The largest ships in real world history happen to fall within Size V, but that doesn't make that category mathematically significant. See where I'm going with this analogy? Medium size seems like a good baseline for size mods because we happen to be Medium creatures and because the word 'medium' implies baseline-ness, but using Medium as a mathematical baseline is as nonsensical as me choosing Size V ships as a baseline. If any size category is used as a mathematical baseline, it should be Tiny because Tiny is closest to zero mass. Assigning Medium as the baseline for size mods is effectively saying "In D&D, the laws of physics have decided that creatures 4' to 8' are special." Not that the laws of physics are the same in D&D as they are in real life, but in such cases they have been changed for the sake of simplicity and expediency. In the case of size mods, D&D's laws of physics are neither simple nor expedient. Do titanic creatures get -16 to attack and AC? That's an admirable goal. 3e isn't my preferred rule set, but I respect anyone who puts a significant amount of effort into any rule set. TS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Size bonus to AC - drop it?
Top