Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tequila Sunrise" data-source="post: 4539937" data-attributes="member: 40398">Well I don't think there is a really good way of making exponential progressions work. Obviously the one that I posted earlier on this thread is just absurd from a balance perspective. Even if we modified it like this:Fine: +10Dim: +9Tiny: +7Small: +4Medium: +0Large: -5Huge: -11Garg: -18Colossal: -26I don't think it would be ideal. Workable, but awkward. This is why I suggested a flat bonus; because whatever minor difference it creates in stat blocks can be remedied with a tweak to natural armor and Strength.Do you have a link to UK's CR guide? My own <a href="http://lukebuchanan.com/TS_Manual_of_Monster_Creation_3e.pdf" target="_blank">CR guide</a> bases monster stats directly off of CR, and I'd like to see how UK handles it.I myself alternate between writing up my own unique RPG and homebrewing material for my favored published game, which is currently 4e. The end result is that I use an extraordinary amount of time to get very little accomplished. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/worried.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-S" title="Uhm    :-S" data-shortname=":-S" />TS</blockquote>