Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Skill at Role-Playing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 6732064" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>And here you're creating a semi-arbitrary distinction.</p><p></p><p>But even if we go with your distinction, I will absolutely say "I try to buy the most cost-effective equipment I can afford" and "I try to learn and have ready as many spells as possible" are 100% expressions of natural play.</p><p></p><p>See my Wand of Cure Light Wounds example. If that thing is on the market at less than half the price of a +1 sword it is highly un-natural play to not try and pick some up (or one of the alternatives) for the party. It's lots of healing in one little happy stick at a bargain price. The 3.0 economy once again falls to natural play with just a very little knowledge of the world.</p><p></p><p>And then there's the saving throw system and the way Save or Suck and Save or Die trumps hit point damage. Natural play for a wizard is to want spells that will make the enemy stop hitting you.</p><p></p><p>Why didn't it get picked up? Because of learned unnatural play due to Gygax and Arneson's system. Where Save vs Spell (i.e. Fireball) was much much harder than save vs Poison (i.e. Stinking Cloud). If you play 3.0 using the unnatural tactics picked up from 2E it actually works pretty well. Come into it cold and try natural tactics with the economy presented, the bear druid, or wizards who try to prevent the enemy hitting back and it breaks accidentally.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Do I have the budget for 3.0?</p><p></p><p>And the simple answer is <em>Gygax did.</em> Admittedly oD&D is the best playtested game in the history of RPGs. But that's because Gygax learned his playtesting from and with wargamers and wasn't afraid to de facto errata. oD&D was playtested by wargamers playing to win. There are <em>few</em> RPG designers </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And taking a cue from software development <em>you send your testers out to try to break the software</em>. This is what the 3.0 playtesters simply didn't do. 3.0 works on the use case expected by the designers - which involves carrying forward a lot of learned behaviour patterns from 2e.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Note how e.g. Marvel Super Heroes didn't. And it doesn't have those problems either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 6732064, member: 87792"] And here you're creating a semi-arbitrary distinction. But even if we go with your distinction, I will absolutely say "I try to buy the most cost-effective equipment I can afford" and "I try to learn and have ready as many spells as possible" are 100% expressions of natural play. See my Wand of Cure Light Wounds example. If that thing is on the market at less than half the price of a +1 sword it is highly un-natural play to not try and pick some up (or one of the alternatives) for the party. It's lots of healing in one little happy stick at a bargain price. The 3.0 economy once again falls to natural play with just a very little knowledge of the world. And then there's the saving throw system and the way Save or Suck and Save or Die trumps hit point damage. Natural play for a wizard is to want spells that will make the enemy stop hitting you. Why didn't it get picked up? Because of learned unnatural play due to Gygax and Arneson's system. Where Save vs Spell (i.e. Fireball) was much much harder than save vs Poison (i.e. Stinking Cloud). If you play 3.0 using the unnatural tactics picked up from 2E it actually works pretty well. Come into it cold and try natural tactics with the economy presented, the bear druid, or wizards who try to prevent the enemy hitting back and it breaks accidentally. Do I have the budget for 3.0? And the simple answer is [I]Gygax did.[/I] Admittedly oD&D is the best playtested game in the history of RPGs. But that's because Gygax learned his playtesting from and with wargamers and wasn't afraid to de facto errata. oD&D was playtested by wargamers playing to win. There are [I]few[/I] RPG designers And taking a cue from software development [I]you send your testers out to try to break the software[/I]. This is what the 3.0 playtesters simply didn't do. 3.0 works on the use case expected by the designers - which involves carrying forward a lot of learned behaviour patterns from 2e. Note how e.g. Marvel Super Heroes didn't. And it doesn't have those problems either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Skill at Role-Playing
Top