Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Skill-based attacks.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ValhallaGH" data-source="post: 3555980" data-attributes="member: 41187"><p>Okay. So this raises two points for me.</p><p>1) Why can't you see BAB as a class's combat skill, only they choose to buy it up so that it increases at the indicated rate? I.e. the choice to improve it is so central to the class's concept that it's automatically invested in.</p><p></p><p>2) What's to stop a DM from deleting the BAB column and replacing it with extra skill points per level (+4 for full, +3 for 3/4 and +2 for 1/2 or something similar)? Then you create a ratio for buying BAB. (With my previous numbers, it would be 4 points for each +1, with the ability to buy fractions just like skill ranks.) This would create the oddity of making Intelligence even more important for combat characters, since too low an Int would eat up their BAB points but I doubt that's really a concern.</p><p>I advocate a higher cost because it's a much more "guaranteed" skill. Simply, if you participate in combat then you will use BAB (see below).</p><p></p><p>But combat skill and the various knowledge skills <em>aren't</em> on par. Combat skills are used every single fight, every single attack, where as a particular knowledge may not be used at all during an entire series of puzzle, role play, or investigatory encounters.</p><p>If you grouped all knowledge skills into one category (Knowledge or Academics) then they could be on par because then the knowledge skill would be used just as frequently for its relevant areas as the combat skill.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, you'd have to group all of the athletic abilities (balance, climb, jump, swim and tumble) into one category to keep them on par with combat skill. All are feats of athleticism, but a series of athletic trials is likely to exclude one or more of them, making them inferior compared to combat skill.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, what's my point? That you'll either need to a) rewrite the entire skill system to bring all the other skills on par with combat or b) you'll need to impose a special cost on combat skill to make it about as pricey as improving a different general area (social, academic, athletic, etc.) or c) you'll need to break up combat skill just as thoroughly as the other skills are divided (at that point, a general improvement in combat ability has the same cost as mastering all social or academic or larcenous areas).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ValhallaGH, post: 3555980, member: 41187"] Okay. So this raises two points for me. 1) Why can't you see BAB as a class's combat skill, only they choose to buy it up so that it increases at the indicated rate? I.e. the choice to improve it is so central to the class's concept that it's automatically invested in. 2) What's to stop a DM from deleting the BAB column and replacing it with extra skill points per level (+4 for full, +3 for 3/4 and +2 for 1/2 or something similar)? Then you create a ratio for buying BAB. (With my previous numbers, it would be 4 points for each +1, with the ability to buy fractions just like skill ranks.) This would create the oddity of making Intelligence even more important for combat characters, since too low an Int would eat up their BAB points but I doubt that's really a concern. I advocate a higher cost because it's a much more "guaranteed" skill. Simply, if you participate in combat then you will use BAB (see below). But combat skill and the various knowledge skills [i]aren't[/i] on par. Combat skills are used every single fight, every single attack, where as a particular knowledge may not be used at all during an entire series of puzzle, role play, or investigatory encounters. If you grouped all knowledge skills into one category (Knowledge or Academics) then they could be on par because then the knowledge skill would be used just as frequently for its relevant areas as the combat skill. Similarly, you'd have to group all of the athletic abilities (balance, climb, jump, swim and tumble) into one category to keep them on par with combat skill. All are feats of athleticism, but a series of athletic trials is likely to exclude one or more of them, making them inferior compared to combat skill. So, what's my point? That you'll either need to a) rewrite the entire skill system to bring all the other skills on par with combat or b) you'll need to impose a special cost on combat skill to make it about as pricey as improving a different general area (social, academic, athletic, etc.) or c) you'll need to break up combat skill just as thoroughly as the other skills are divided (at that point, a general improvement in combat ability has the same cost as mastering all social or academic or larcenous areas). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Skill-based attacks.
Top