Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Skill Challenge DCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4940501" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>I am not sure if you agree with me or not, but maybe I should rephrase it: </p><p>The high likelihood of succes of the challenge is not the problem. We win combats all the time, too. Despite overwhelming odds and all.</p><p></p><p>The problem is that each individual aspect of the challenge is too easy. It doesn't get exciting if you know there is little chance of failing each round. There is no tension. </p><p>To create such tension, raising the DCs works. But it also means that challenges are far more likely to fail then combat. That is not, in my view, all that satisfying, and it doesn't make the decision-making process any more interesting, either.</p><p></p><p>The trick is having the challenge succeed most of the time if the players work hard for it and feel smart. (And sometimes lucky.) This requires some "tactical"/"gambling" element. In combat, you risk resources like healing surges and powers and have to apply them at the right time. A good skill challenges need this kind of dynamic, too.</p><p></p><p>They do not get more interesting just because there is a different chance of failure. They get more exciting if people have to think about how they can achieve access and avoid ways they can't. Based on their decisions, not merely their dice rolls. </p><p></p><p>The trick is finding ways to make this kind of decision non-trivial. Using the highest applicable skill all the time is trivial. </p><p></p><p>One way might be to have more complex outcomes than just "pass/fail" - the skills you have used determine the details of your success or failure. If you bluff your way through the guards it is different then using Diplomacy to make them your friends. If you use stealth to get buy that is also different.</p><p></p><p>If you use an approach that raises the DC, my suggestion would be to add the ability to undo failures. But these "rescue-rolls" can't be used all the time. Maybe the guards will fall for the diversion represented by your Bluff check only once, so only one Stealth check is "free". </p><p></p><p>I think some kind of "resource management" system is what skill challenges would need.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4940501, member: 710"] I am not sure if you agree with me or not, but maybe I should rephrase it: The high likelihood of succes of the challenge is not the problem. We win combats all the time, too. Despite overwhelming odds and all. The problem is that each individual aspect of the challenge is too easy. It doesn't get exciting if you know there is little chance of failing each round. There is no tension. To create such tension, raising the DCs works. But it also means that challenges are far more likely to fail then combat. That is not, in my view, all that satisfying, and it doesn't make the decision-making process any more interesting, either. The trick is having the challenge succeed most of the time if the players work hard for it and feel smart. (And sometimes lucky.) This requires some "tactical"/"gambling" element. In combat, you risk resources like healing surges and powers and have to apply them at the right time. A good skill challenges need this kind of dynamic, too. They do not get more interesting just because there is a different chance of failure. They get more exciting if people have to think about how they can achieve access and avoid ways they can't. Based on their decisions, not merely their dice rolls. The trick is finding ways to make this kind of decision non-trivial. Using the highest applicable skill all the time is trivial. One way might be to have more complex outcomes than just "pass/fail" - the skills you have used determine the details of your success or failure. If you bluff your way through the guards it is different then using Diplomacy to make them your friends. If you use stealth to get buy that is also different. If you use an approach that raises the DC, my suggestion would be to add the ability to undo failures. But these "rescue-rolls" can't be used all the time. Maybe the guards will fall for the diversion represented by your Bluff check only once, so only one Stealth check is "free". I think some kind of "resource management" system is what skill challenges would need. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Skill Challenge DCs
Top