Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skill Challenges in 5e?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 6469562" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>Tagging along and not making a skill check is just another form of staying back at the inn. Bob is still not participating. He's shut out and has to stand there watching while the charismatic types carry the ball. </p><p></p><p>With "X successes in Y passes," Bob is an asset to the party, however small. He can participate. He has an incentive to do whatever he can think of to help the party. If all he can come up with is to stand there looking imposing, fine--he can try an Intimidate check at DC 15 to impress the king with his quiet confidence. He'll probably fail, but there's no penalty for failure except opportunity cost. Taking a long shot is better than doing nothing.</p><p></p><p>With "X successes before Y failures," doing nothing is better than taking a long shot. Bob's worth in the skill challenge is zero. The best thing he can do is sit down and shut up. If the king turns to him and asks him a question, his worth goes from zero to negative.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Your logic is based on the assumption that all four PCs are participating in the challenge. Take that away, and it falls apart.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Let's say you need 3 successes on 1 pass. Which party members should participate? The obvious answer is "all of them," because you get 1 roll per PC. If you have three PCs involved, they all have to succeed. No one has any room to fail. If you add Bob the Silent, and one of the first three PCs fails, it's just possible that Bob could pull things out with a meaningful stare and a natural 20. The party's chances are better, if only a little.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Now suppose you need 3 successes before 2 failures. Which party members should participate? The answer, if you can swing it, is "Lucky the Loquacious, bard extraordinaire, and nobody else." Lucky has the best Persuasion check, therefore you should let her do all the talking and make all the rolls. She's almost certain to get 3 successes before 2 failures. Every other party member is a liability dragging Lucky down. If you can't convince your DM to let Lucky go it alone, then at the very least you should try to keep Bob out of sight.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 6469562, member: 58197"] Tagging along and not making a skill check is just another form of staying back at the inn. Bob is still not participating. He's shut out and has to stand there watching while the charismatic types carry the ball. With "X successes in Y passes," Bob is an asset to the party, however small. He can participate. He has an incentive to do whatever he can think of to help the party. If all he can come up with is to stand there looking imposing, fine--he can try an Intimidate check at DC 15 to impress the king with his quiet confidence. He'll probably fail, but there's no penalty for failure except opportunity cost. Taking a long shot is better than doing nothing. With "X successes before Y failures," doing nothing is better than taking a long shot. Bob's worth in the skill challenge is zero. The best thing he can do is sit down and shut up. If the king turns to him and asks him a question, his worth goes from zero to negative. [FONT=Verdana] Your logic is based on the assumption that all four PCs are participating in the challenge. Take that away, and it falls apart. Let's say you need 3 successes on 1 pass. Which party members should participate? The obvious answer is "all of them," because you get 1 roll per PC. If you have three PCs involved, they all have to succeed. No one has any room to fail. If you add Bob the Silent, and one of the first three PCs fails, it's just possible that Bob could pull things out with a meaningful stare and a natural 20. The party's chances are better, if only a little. Now suppose you need 3 successes before 2 failures. Which party members should participate? The answer, if you can swing it, is "Lucky the Loquacious, bard extraordinaire, and nobody else." Lucky has the best Persuasion check, therefore you should let her do all the talking and make all the rolls. She's almost certain to get 3 successes before 2 failures. Every other party member is a liability dragging Lucky down. If you can't convince your DM to let Lucky go it alone, then at the very least you should try to keep Bob out of sight.[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skill Challenges in 5e?
Top