Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
+skill items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 838053" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>There are a lot of house rules for these. If you just want to play with costs a bit, I'd go (bonus^2) * 50gp for limited-use skills like Jump, and (bonus^2) * 100gp for more useful stuff like Tumble or Hide. Yes, that's 5 times the DMG list price, but to me it's still worth that much. On an opposed roll, a simple +4 modifier changes it from a 47.5% win, 5% tie, 47.5% lose distribution to 66% win, 4% tie, 30% lose one. This can be huge in practice.</p><p></p><p>But even that isn't enough, IMO. It's just too easy for someone to pick up a cross-class +10 skill item and be great. If you're someone who's already raised that skill, it makes you almost untouchable, but the fact that it levels the playing field too much hurts skill-based classes (like Rogues) more than anything.</p><p></p><p>Then, there are flukes for the set-DC skills. Put a +10 Concentration item on a caster and now he can cast everything defensively. Same goes for Tumble.</p><p></p><p>The cost structure I started using IMC was:</p><p></p><p>25 gp * bonus * caster level for limited-use or non-opposed skills (Jump, any Knowledge skill, any Craft, any Profession, etc.), and</p><p>50 gp * bonus * caster level for useful/combat skills or anything requiring an opposed check.</p><p></p><p>Then, change the rules like this:</p><p>> The "bonus" is "virtual skill points". That is, they give virtual skill ranks, except that the bonus is cut in half if it's not a class skill for any of your classes. These virtual ranks only matter for skill checks; you can't use virtual skill ranks to give more Bardic Music abilities (Perform) or qualify for PrCs.</p><p>> The item cannot give you a higher skill rank total (actual skill ranks + virtual ones from the item) than the item's caster level. It CAN give you more than your normal maximum of (level+3).</p><p></p><p>So, the Boots of Elvenkind might be +10 Move Silently items with caster level 12, for a cost of 6000gp.</p><p>> If you're a Rogue who already has a +12 or higher skill modifier, the boots are useless. On the other hand, have one made that's +5 with caster level 20 (same cost), and you're fine.</p><p>> If you're a Rogue who hasn't spent any points on Move Silently, you'll probably get the full +10 bonus. But, if you start raising the skill on your own, you'll get less and less use out of them, until eventually you're so skilled that they're not helping any.</p><p>> If you're a Wizard, you'll get a +5 bonus.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the numbers can be tweaked as needed.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: Forgot to add, we got the idea from the cybernetic chip implant rules from games like Shadowrun or Cyberpunk. That is, the chip gave you skills by letting you mimic the recorded actions of someone who knew what they were doing. You'd be able to actually DO the stuff they did, whether it was martial arts or auto repair, but you wouldn't really understand why it was working; once you removed the chip you wouldn't have gained any actual skills. And, if you already knew how to do it, the chip wouldn't help.</p><p>So, we just said that the magical +skill items were the same sort of thing</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 838053, member: 3051"] There are a lot of house rules for these. If you just want to play with costs a bit, I'd go (bonus^2) * 50gp for limited-use skills like Jump, and (bonus^2) * 100gp for more useful stuff like Tumble or Hide. Yes, that's 5 times the DMG list price, but to me it's still worth that much. On an opposed roll, a simple +4 modifier changes it from a 47.5% win, 5% tie, 47.5% lose distribution to 66% win, 4% tie, 30% lose one. This can be huge in practice. But even that isn't enough, IMO. It's just too easy for someone to pick up a cross-class +10 skill item and be great. If you're someone who's already raised that skill, it makes you almost untouchable, but the fact that it levels the playing field too much hurts skill-based classes (like Rogues) more than anything. Then, there are flukes for the set-DC skills. Put a +10 Concentration item on a caster and now he can cast everything defensively. Same goes for Tumble. The cost structure I started using IMC was: 25 gp * bonus * caster level for limited-use or non-opposed skills (Jump, any Knowledge skill, any Craft, any Profession, etc.), and 50 gp * bonus * caster level for useful/combat skills or anything requiring an opposed check. Then, change the rules like this: > The "bonus" is "virtual skill points". That is, they give virtual skill ranks, except that the bonus is cut in half if it's not a class skill for any of your classes. These virtual ranks only matter for skill checks; you can't use virtual skill ranks to give more Bardic Music abilities (Perform) or qualify for PrCs. > The item cannot give you a higher skill rank total (actual skill ranks + virtual ones from the item) than the item's caster level. It CAN give you more than your normal maximum of (level+3). So, the Boots of Elvenkind might be +10 Move Silently items with caster level 12, for a cost of 6000gp. > If you're a Rogue who already has a +12 or higher skill modifier, the boots are useless. On the other hand, have one made that's +5 with caster level 20 (same cost), and you're fine. > If you're a Rogue who hasn't spent any points on Move Silently, you'll probably get the full +10 bonus. But, if you start raising the skill on your own, you'll get less and less use out of them, until eventually you're so skilled that they're not helping any. > If you're a Wizard, you'll get a +5 bonus. Anyway, the numbers can be tweaked as needed. EDIT: Forgot to add, we got the idea from the cybernetic chip implant rules from games like Shadowrun or Cyberpunk. That is, the chip gave you skills by letting you mimic the recorded actions of someone who knew what they were doing. You'd be able to actually DO the stuff they did, whether it was martial arts or auto repair, but you wouldn't really understand why it was working; once you removed the chip you wouldn't have gained any actual skills. And, if you already knew how to do it, the chip wouldn't help. So, we just said that the magical +skill items were the same sort of thing [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
+skill items
Top