Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skills and Ability Checks -- Perspective on Consistency vs DM Empowerment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7857846" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>"Trained" was a good rule in 3e, it worked for me. It only has 2 downsides:</p><p></p><p>1) it encouraged some players into jack-of-all-trades just to "unlock" more skill uses, because in 3e it only takes a single skill point or two to get the first skill "rank" and become "trained"; then it can lead to characters who can do a lot more things between combats but are overall really bad at them, so they try all the time and fail mostly, thus wasting time (this would not be a problem in 5e because being proficient in a skill is usually at the expense of another skill)</p><p></p><p>2) a lot of people just don't like being told that their characters cannot even try something</p><p></p><p>Because 5e wanted to be inclusive, it mostly allows to try anything with skills and doesn't normally require to be proficient. That however is not stopping me as a DM to actually DO require it, because even if the PHB doesn't say so, there is always the rule that the DM decides to allow a check. So I decide to sometimes allow it only when a proficient character tries it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7857846, member: 1465"] "Trained" was a good rule in 3e, it worked for me. It only has 2 downsides: 1) it encouraged some players into jack-of-all-trades just to "unlock" more skill uses, because in 3e it only takes a single skill point or two to get the first skill "rank" and become "trained"; then it can lead to characters who can do a lot more things between combats but are overall really bad at them, so they try all the time and fail mostly, thus wasting time (this would not be a problem in 5e because being proficient in a skill is usually at the expense of another skill) 2) a lot of people just don't like being told that their characters cannot even try something Because 5e wanted to be inclusive, it mostly allows to try anything with skills and doesn't normally require to be proficient. That however is not stopping me as a DM to actually DO require it, because even if the PHB doesn't say so, there is always the rule that the DM decides to allow a check. So I decide to sometimes allow it only when a proficient character tries it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skills and Ability Checks -- Perspective on Consistency vs DM Empowerment
Top