Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7858165" data-attributes="member: 996">Do you participate in boardgaming discussion groups and shield your favorite boardgame from criticism by asserting &quot;well, it's not an RPG!&quot;Nah, the occasional cone of anti-magic doesn't cut it.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Balance is prettymuch mathematical - especially in that example, which, I don't entirely disagree with. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />5e only really seeks balance along a few key indicators, but DPR is one of 'em, and straightforward combat pillar balance, over 6-8 medium/hard combat encounters, with 2-3 short rets, generally shakes out reasonably well.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7858165, member: 996"] Do you participate in boardgaming discussion groups and shield your favorite boardgame from criticism by asserting "well, it's not an RPG!" Nah, the occasional cone of anti-magic doesn't cut it. ;) Balance is prettymuch mathematical - especially in that example, which, I don't [I]entirely[/I] disagree with. ;) 5e only really seeks balance along a few key indicators, but DPR is one of 'em, and straightforward combat pillar balance, over 6-8 medium/hard combat encounters, with 2-3 short rets, generally shakes out reasonably well. [/QUOTE]

Verification