Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skills Redux
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7108086" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Sorry, but you're leaping to conclusions here. </p><p></p><p>Picking an existing background with an eye towards your class skills is one thing; completely abusing the offer to come up with your own background is another. </p><p></p><p>There is no need to assume the latter just because of the former, so let's not go where you just went - that is, accusing my players of having to grow up. </p><p></p><p>There is no "extra work", as in, I am not Reduxing to try to close off every avenue of abuse. </p><p></p><p>But saying "since we can't close off every abuse, we should not even try to improve the rules as written" is not a logical argument. </p><p></p><p>Just because there are still ways to abuse freedoms does not mean</p><p>1) that they will be</p><p>or</p><p>2) that it lacks value to plug up obvious holes in the rules.</p><p></p><p>The rules have definite deficiences. But the ability to create new backgrounds is <strong>not</strong> one of them.</p><p></p><p>What I want is a ruleset where printed options can be used without DM approval. Creating entirely new features (backgrounds, feats, classes etc) comes with automatic DM supervision so those aren't a problem. Things you're supposed to be able to just take and use (like GWM) is.</p><p></p><p>So I want to fix the latter category without having to discuss the former. Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7108086, member: 12731"] Sorry, but you're leaping to conclusions here. Picking an existing background with an eye towards your class skills is one thing; completely abusing the offer to come up with your own background is another. There is no need to assume the latter just because of the former, so let's not go where you just went - that is, accusing my players of having to grow up. There is no "extra work", as in, I am not Reduxing to try to close off every avenue of abuse. But saying "since we can't close off every abuse, we should not even try to improve the rules as written" is not a logical argument. Just because there are still ways to abuse freedoms does not mean 1) that they will be or 2) that it lacks value to plug up obvious holes in the rules. The rules have definite deficiences. But the ability to create new backgrounds is [B]not[/B] one of them. What I want is a ruleset where printed options can be used without DM approval. Creating entirely new features (backgrounds, feats, classes etc) comes with automatic DM supervision so those aren't a problem. Things you're supposed to be able to just take and use (like GWM) is. So I want to fix the latter category without having to discuss the former. Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skills Redux
Top