Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skywrite: a weapon of mass communication/coordination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="greg kaye" data-source="post: 9045796" data-attributes="member: 7030543"><p>As far as I know, Skywrite is effectively the most far-reaching of AoE spells.</p><p></p><p>The spell simply says that "You cause up to ten words to form in a part of the sky you can see", and that, "The words appear to be made of cloud".</p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">No direct reference is made to height but, with reference to sky and a resemblance to cloud, we might apply potential heights of several thousand feet and up to well over 40,000 feet (as related to Earth-based atmospheric physics)."</span></p><p></p><p>Reading the spell's stats:</p><p>Skywrite is available to Bards, Druids, Wizards, and Artificers as a 2nd level, potentially <strong>ritually cast</strong> spell for the writing of <strong>10</strong> words in the sky that may be read across a wide area.</p><p>For the sake of comparison:</p><p>Sending is available to Bards, Clerics, and Wizards as a 3rd level spell to "send a short [audible] message of <strong>twenty-five</strong> words or less to a creature with which you are familiar. The creature hears the message in its mind, recognizes you as the sender if it knows you, and <strong>can answer in a like manner</strong> immediately." So <strong>50 words</strong> total communication but without any potential for anonymity.</p><p></p><p>But, as a ritual cast, skywrite can, over say (a little more than) eight hours worth of casting, be used to write 480 words (for anyone inclined to look up for updates) and doesn't cost spell slots.</p><p></p><p>edit: while "(a little more than) eight hours worth of casting" may be required "to write 480 words", RAW, the castings may need to be spread out over a longer period of time if they would have much chance of being read.</p><p></p><p>While Skywrite can be cast as a ritual, it requires concentration, as would the casting of a subsequent ritual. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]287891[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Sending, in comparison, wouldn't be so good at sending long messages when Skywrite could be effectively used. /edit.</p><p></p><p>Per long rest, Sending can be used (prior to any use of arcane recovery...): by a fifth-level full caster with their 2 3rd-level slots (for 50 words of one-way messaging); or by a 14th-level caster with their 3 3rd level slots, their 3 4th level slot, their 2 5th level slot, their 1 6th level slot, and their 1 7th level slot (for a potential 250 words of one-way messaging).</p><p>My guess is that a caster proficient in both spells might use sending once (mainly for an identity confirming "can someone with you take down some slowly appearing skywrite messaging on x topic?") and, given time and other requirements for spell slot use, skywrite for the body text.</p><p></p><p>However, I suspect that, in some worlds, druid's might try to seek and destroy the persistent skywriterati. As far as druid personal messaging is concerned, I guess a question might be would the druid be happier with naughty word with the sky with skywrite or (potentially?) risking the lives... of animals with animal messenger. (But, surely, the message with animal messenger would typically be something like "get ready to hold/entice a subsequent animal messenger to read the longer message on its leg."</p><p></p><p>A 15th level wizard can potentially get the telepathy spell if it is made available or if s/he wouldn't prefer to use 1 of their 2 new spells per level spells for ~chat rather than to acquire the likes of antimagic field, clone, dominate monster, feeblemind, illusory dragon, and maze.</p><p></p><p><strong>Propaganda and battle communications.</strong></p><p></p><p>However, the main benefit of skywrite is its potential use in mass communication. In a campaign with political leanings, its influence (whether or not the sender's' identity is declared or insinuated) could be incredible.</p><p></p><p>In battle communications, messages like "Commence Operation Overlord, or ... Rolling Thunder, or ... Desert Storm" could be used to coordinate things like attacks while messages like "Commence [just making some word up to naughty word with the enemy]" could also be sent out every ten minutes.</p><p></p><p>Bards have limits to their known spells, but skywrite could be a flavourful choice. What could be better for a bard with those concert promotions and what better for a ruler/governance than having a herald that can write in the sky. In a stage of our campaign that's gone a bit political, my bard flavours the spell as a Beatles-styled, vapour stack writer, "... and I need to text and I want to be a vapour stack writer..." <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🎶" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f3b6.png" title="Musical notes :notes:" data-shortname=":notes:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />. However, it's definitely a spell that might be dropped if the politics can be sorted out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="greg kaye, post: 9045796, member: 7030543"] As far as I know, Skywrite is effectively the most far-reaching of AoE spells. The spell simply says that "You cause up to ten words to form in a part of the sky you can see", and that, "The words appear to be made of cloud". [SIZE=2]No direct reference is made to height but, with reference to sky and a resemblance to cloud, we might apply potential heights of several thousand feet and up to well over 40,000 feet (as related to Earth-based atmospheric physics)."[/SIZE] Reading the spell's stats: Skywrite is available to Bards, Druids, Wizards, and Artificers as a 2nd level, potentially [B]ritually cast[/B] spell for the writing of [B]10[/B] words in the sky that may be read across a wide area. For the sake of comparison: Sending is available to Bards, Clerics, and Wizards as a 3rd level spell to "send a short [audible] message of [B]twenty-five[/B] words or less to a creature with which you are familiar. The creature hears the message in its mind, recognizes you as the sender if it knows you, and [B]can answer in a like manner[/B] immediately." So [B]50 words[/B] total communication but without any potential for anonymity. But, as a ritual cast, skywrite can, over say (a little more than) eight hours worth of casting, be used to write 480 words (for anyone inclined to look up for updates) and doesn't cost spell slots. edit: while "(a little more than) eight hours worth of casting" may be required "to write 480 words", RAW, the castings may need to be spread out over a longer period of time if they would have much chance of being read. While Skywrite can be cast as a ritual, it requires concentration, as would the casting of a subsequent ritual. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1686912261835.png"]287891[/ATTACH] Sending, in comparison, wouldn't be so good at sending long messages when Skywrite could be effectively used. /edit. Per long rest, Sending can be used (prior to any use of arcane recovery...): by a fifth-level full caster with their 2 3rd-level slots (for 50 words of one-way messaging); or by a 14th-level caster with their 3 3rd level slots, their 3 4th level slot, their 2 5th level slot, their 1 6th level slot, and their 1 7th level slot (for a potential 250 words of one-way messaging). My guess is that a caster proficient in both spells might use sending once (mainly for an identity confirming "can someone with you take down some slowly appearing skywrite messaging on x topic?") and, given time and other requirements for spell slot use, skywrite for the body text. However, I suspect that, in some worlds, druid's might try to seek and destroy the persistent skywriterati. As far as druid personal messaging is concerned, I guess a question might be would the druid be happier with naughty word with the sky with skywrite or (potentially?) risking the lives... of animals with animal messenger. (But, surely, the message with animal messenger would typically be something like "get ready to hold/entice a subsequent animal messenger to read the longer message on its leg." A 15th level wizard can potentially get the telepathy spell if it is made available or if s/he wouldn't prefer to use 1 of their 2 new spells per level spells for ~chat rather than to acquire the likes of antimagic field, clone, dominate monster, feeblemind, illusory dragon, and maze. [B]Propaganda and battle communications.[/B] However, the main benefit of skywrite is its potential use in mass communication. In a campaign with political leanings, its influence (whether or not the sender's' identity is declared or insinuated) could be incredible. In battle communications, messages like "Commence Operation Overlord, or ... Rolling Thunder, or ... Desert Storm" could be used to coordinate things like attacks while messages like "Commence [just making some word up to naughty word with the enemy]" could also be sent out every ten minutes. Bards have limits to their known spells, but skywrite could be a flavourful choice. What could be better for a bard with those concert promotions and what better for a ruler/governance than having a herald that can write in the sky. In a stage of our campaign that's gone a bit political, my bard flavours the spell as a Beatles-styled, vapour stack writer, "... and I need to text and I want to be a vapour stack writer..." 🎶. However, it's definitely a spell that might be dropped if the politics can be sorted out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Skywrite: a weapon of mass communication/coordination
Top