Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Azazyll" data-source="post: 1474586" data-attributes="member: 4367">Has anbody read Echoes of the Past yet?&nbsp; I was wondering if it was any good.&nbsp; Usually I would wait for a review, but I'm tired of waiting for someone to review it.&nbsp; And to give this thread more of a thread-ish feel, I think some discussion on how people are handling all of the recently released 3rd party publisher psionic products that have been put out of date almost before they could see use.&nbsp; S&amp;S is a big one but certainly not the only one.&nbsp; Personally I'm thinking of the Ravenloft DMG, which just brought psionics into Ravenloft.&nbsp; It seems to me, and I have not yet read the new Expanded Psionics Handbook, that from what I've heard substantial revisions would have to be made.&nbsp; Fortunately, it looks like Cordell will be updating his products for Malhavoc, but still, what does everybody think?&nbsp; Keep using the old rules, use 3rd party rules, or modify everything yourself to fit the new book?Hopefully that was coherent.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Azazyll, post: 1474586, member: 4367"] Has anbody read Echoes of the Past yet? I was wondering if it was any good. Usually I would wait for a review, but I'm tired of waiting for someone to review it. And to give this thread more of a thread-ish feel, I think some discussion on how people are handling all of the recently released 3rd party publisher psionic products that have been put out of date almost before they could see use. S&S is a big one but certainly not the only one. Personally I'm thinking of the Ravenloft DMG, which just brought psionics into Ravenloft. It seems to me, and I have not yet read the new Expanded Psionics Handbook, that from what I've heard substantial revisions would have to be made. Fortunately, it looks like Cordell will be updating his products for Malhavoc, but still, what does everybody think? Keep using the old rules, use 3rd party rules, or modify everything yourself to fit the new book? Hopefully that was coherent. [/QUOTE]

Verification