Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"slash" and kenjutsu, BnF2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 1679666" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>As I recall further, I was looking for historical data on rapiers, so that may be a key word to use in the search on those sites.</p><p></p><p>Among the first articles I found were those discussing which was more dangerous, the slash or the thrust.</p><p></p><p>What the various articles boiled down to was that thrusting weapons were deadlier- a well placed thrust would be quick and fatal- but it didn't have much "stopping power." This was based on an analysis of the bodies of known duelist fatalities. They tended to have multiple wounds- any of which would have been fatal, but the number of wounds indicated the fights lasted some time. They also found a low number of healed wounds.</p><p></p><p>In contrast, slashing wounds were found to have less lethality, but more "stopping power." In a similar examination of bodies, the researchers found an overall higher number healed wounds, and a lower percentage of wounds that would be considered fatal.</p><p></p><p>In addition, they did tests with thrusting and slashing weapons on the same kind of materials designed to test new ammunition properties. Thrusts delivered deep, penetrating wounds that would do a serious number on a person's vitals. The wounds were also small and mechanically efficient in that most of the energy of the strike was delivered into a small area, like an armor-piercing round. While the thrust might be fatal, the opponent would not neccessarily be instantly disabled, allowing the fight to continue.</p><p></p><p>By way of contrast, a well-delivered slashing cut transmitted a lot of force over a broad area, and tended to disrupt the surrounding flesh in the same way as a hollow-point round. That is, there were visible shock waves that traveled throughout the "test-bodies"- the result in a living being would be intense pain over a great area around the wound, possibly putting the opponent into shock, dropping the opponent almost instantly. Thus, a fight was more likely to be settled with a non-fatal blow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 1679666, member: 19675"] As I recall further, I was looking for historical data on rapiers, so that may be a key word to use in the search on those sites. Among the first articles I found were those discussing which was more dangerous, the slash or the thrust. What the various articles boiled down to was that thrusting weapons were deadlier- a well placed thrust would be quick and fatal- but it didn't have much "stopping power." This was based on an analysis of the bodies of known duelist fatalities. They tended to have multiple wounds- any of which would have been fatal, but the number of wounds indicated the fights lasted some time. They also found a low number of healed wounds. In contrast, slashing wounds were found to have less lethality, but more "stopping power." In a similar examination of bodies, the researchers found an overall higher number healed wounds, and a lower percentage of wounds that would be considered fatal. In addition, they did tests with thrusting and slashing weapons on the same kind of materials designed to test new ammunition properties. Thrusts delivered deep, penetrating wounds that would do a serious number on a person's vitals. The wounds were also small and mechanically efficient in that most of the energy of the strike was delivered into a small area, like an armor-piercing round. While the thrust might be fatal, the opponent would not neccessarily be instantly disabled, allowing the fight to continue. By way of contrast, a well-delivered slashing cut transmitted a lot of force over a broad area, and tended to disrupt the surrounding flesh in the same way as a hollow-point round. That is, there were visible shock waves that traveled throughout the "test-bodies"- the result in a living being would be intense pain over a great area around the wound, possibly putting the opponent into shock, dropping the opponent almost instantly. Thus, a fight was more likely to be settled with a non-fatal blow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"slash" and kenjutsu, BnF2?
Top