Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Slavery and evil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DMScott" data-source="post: 1919674" data-attributes="member: 11734"><p>And I am simply pointing out that by the exact same <em>rules as written</em>, <em>Charm Person</em> is Evil in D&D. Yet <em>Charm Person</em> is not treated as inherently evil in any of the source material that I'm aware of; quite the opposite, the spell is often found in the arsenal of good creatures. I don't know a single DM who claims that <em>Charm Person</em> is absolutely, objectively evil unless house-ruled otherwise; not even you will take that position, instead claiming that whether this completely oppressive spell is evil depends on the circumstances of its use. This shows us that the line you're so fond of quoting offers absolutely no justification for painting anything as evil. It's simply a guideline for a DM to follow when setting up their own absolute alignment system, and different DMs will put different actions on either side of the Evil line.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I misunderstood when you agreed that <em>Charm Person</em> was not inherently evil, or when you put forward manacles as an example of how silly the "oppression = evil" argument is? I think perhaps any misunderstanding is more likely to be due to your confusion as to what you're arguing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I am pointing out that since you do not follow your own quoted rules, you have not made any such case. I think perhaps you should sit down and figure out what exactly is and is not evil under the system you propose, I think that will help you come up with a somewhat coherent argument as to what is and is not evil. I think you'll find that some things that involve "hurting, oppressing, and killing others" are indeed evil, and some you'll believe do not.</p><p></p><p>Of course, at that point you'll have arrived at exactly the statement you objected to: that a DM has to define both an absolute alignment system and the form(s) of slavery in their campaign before they can make the call as to whether it's Evil or not.</p><p></p><p>Since you have done nothing but prove my point in any of your replies, we are simply spinning our wheels here, so this is my last response in this thread. Good luck, and have a good day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DMScott, post: 1919674, member: 11734"] And I am simply pointing out that by the exact same [i]rules as written[/i], [i]Charm Person[/i] is Evil in D&D. Yet [i]Charm Person[/i] is not treated as inherently evil in any of the source material that I'm aware of; quite the opposite, the spell is often found in the arsenal of good creatures. I don't know a single DM who claims that [i]Charm Person[/i] is absolutely, objectively evil unless house-ruled otherwise; not even you will take that position, instead claiming that whether this completely oppressive spell is evil depends on the circumstances of its use. This shows us that the line you're so fond of quoting offers absolutely no justification for painting anything as evil. It's simply a guideline for a DM to follow when setting up their own absolute alignment system, and different DMs will put different actions on either side of the Evil line. So I misunderstood when you agreed that [i]Charm Person[/i] was not inherently evil, or when you put forward manacles as an example of how silly the "oppression = evil" argument is? I think perhaps any misunderstanding is more likely to be due to your confusion as to what you're arguing. And I am pointing out that since you do not follow your own quoted rules, you have not made any such case. I think perhaps you should sit down and figure out what exactly is and is not evil under the system you propose, I think that will help you come up with a somewhat coherent argument as to what is and is not evil. I think you'll find that some things that involve "hurting, oppressing, and killing others" are indeed evil, and some you'll believe do not. Of course, at that point you'll have arrived at exactly the statement you objected to: that a DM has to define both an absolute alignment system and the form(s) of slavery in their campaign before they can make the call as to whether it's Evil or not. Since you have done nothing but prove my point in any of your replies, we are simply spinning our wheels here, so this is my last response in this thread. Good luck, and have a good day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Slavery and evil
Top