Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Terwox" data-source="post: 425011" data-attributes="member: 1044">Typo:&nbsp; Section 2:&nbsp; First type in box:&nbsp; Role-plaing gamesI'm a psych undergrad -- so my advice is less of saying that &quot;you're wrong!&quot; and more of &quot;well, maybe...&quot;Section 3, you might want to put the words in the drop-down boxes, not the numbers.Section 4 and 5 are balanced against each other with people tending to answer extremely -- but Section 6 isn't -- all the socially desirabile things are on the right.&nbsp; Might want to change that?&nbsp; Might not.&nbsp; (Like I said, I'm an undergrad who is unsure of himself. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)Section four has abnormal anchors for the scale -- I think.Well, that's my basic ideas.&nbsp; I guess you said you pretty much had the instrument done, so I'm sorry if all that advice was unwanted, or worse yet ill-advised.Oh, in Section 7, question 1, maybe change that from &quot;(quantify)&quot; to &quot;(quantify, not quantity)&quot;&nbsp; -- the question made me pause for a second.That's what I've got.Will you announce on here when it's taking place, or is it closed?&nbsp; Regardless, I'm very interested as to your results -- I'll email you soon.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Terwox, post: 425011, member: 1044"] Typo: Section 2: First type in box: Role-plaing games I'm a psych undergrad -- so my advice is less of saying that "you're wrong!" and more of "well, maybe..." Section 3, you might want to put the words in the drop-down boxes, not the numbers. Section 4 and 5 are balanced against each other with people tending to answer extremely -- but Section 6 isn't -- all the socially desirabile things are on the right. Might want to change that? Might not. (Like I said, I'm an undergrad who is unsure of himself. :)) Section four has abnormal anchors for the scale -- I think. Well, that's my basic ideas. I guess you said you pretty much had the instrument done, so I'm sorry if all that advice was unwanted, or worse yet ill-advised. Oh, in Section 7, question 1, maybe change that from "(quantify)" to "(quantify, not quantity)" -- the question made me pause for a second. That's what I've got. Will you announce on here when it's taking place, or is it closed? Regardless, I'm very interested as to your results -- I'll email you soon. [/QUOTE]

Verification