Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5263193" data-attributes="member: 18280">Well, it is one of those things that matters only in corner cases -- such as when discussing the length of a typical campaign.However, I would guess that there is actually quite a bit of overlap in definitions.  A campaign ends, and a new campaign begins, when the participants feel that they are now doing "a new thing" -- regardless of why this is so.Identity doesn't follow conservation laws.  It is quite possible for some participants to view a series of game sessions as two (or more) seperate campaigns, while others view them as the same campaign.  It is also possible for a campaign to split (esp. if there are multiple GMs), with the participants of both viewing their ongoing sessions as the same campaign.Does it really matter?  No.But where terminology confuses conversation, it is worthwhile to try to clarify what is meant -- and then to accept what is meant within the context of that poster and that conversation, even if that meaning differs from how one uses a term oneself.IMHO, anyway.RC</blockquote>