Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneak attack + flanking = confusion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amal Shukup" data-source="post: 1405610" data-attributes="member: 6291"><p>From a mechanical point of view it should be flanked = flanked. Driven by the position of the attackers, <strong>NOT</strong> on some metagamed state of mind.</p><p></p><p>"I ignore the goblin <strong>completely</strong> in order to avoid taking a Flanking bonus from his buddy the Ogre." </p><p></p><p>Ignore a combatant totally? Closed eyes?!? Seriously!?! </p><p></p><p>Sounds like the character is completely helpless vs that opponent that round... I don't see why the Goblin can't 'Coup de Grace' him (carefully and meticulously opening a femoral artery, say. Colorfully described as 'slicing the bottom off a water balloon'). Or, how about effectively Zero Dex? </p><p></p><p>"Oh, I'm not ignoring him THAT much!" Fine. You're flanked. Unless I was feeling particularly annoyed, in which case it would be "TOO LATE. Here are some d6s and paper. Go roll up a new character. Next Rules Lawyer please."</p><p></p><p>Harsh? Maybe, but the whole thing is silly.</p><p></p><p>Another possibility: How effectively <strong>can</strong> somebody ignore a goblin sawing away at one's kidney? Sounds like a Concentration Check at the very least. DC = the Combined Attack Rolls of the Flankers seems about right...</p><p></p><p>Or screw it. Ogre is a 1st level Warrior. Goblin, sadly, is a 15th level Rogue/Assassin and he's been studying his target for the last three rounds. Guess Metagaming didn't pay off...</p><p></p><p>But all of these are dodges. And punitive ones at that: Flanking should be a condition imposed by the position of the attackers. The whole see/no see state of mind thing raises too many loopholes.</p><p></p><p>I even think invisible creatures should contribute to a Flank. I think one becomes at least subconsciously aware of the THREAT posed by an invisible creature once they move close enough to attack. The whole gestalt of sound, smell, air pressure, movement etc.*. Not enough to neccesarily target them effectively, but enough to be 'threatened' by them and therefore be flanked. That's just an interpretation though.</p><p></p><p>A'Mal</p><p>______________________________________</p><p>* I've experienced this. Not, obviously, with invisible creatures, but in total darkness situations - both in martial arts classes (a thorough beating was enjoyed by all) and in photographic darkrooms. A person just standing quietly is quite easy to sense. One moving with any kind of rapidity is almost impossible to not sense. </p><p></p><p>I'm not suggesting that being aware of them makes it easy to defend against them (IBID 'thorough beatings'), just that they would 'threaten' quite effectively...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amal Shukup, post: 1405610, member: 6291"] From a mechanical point of view it should be flanked = flanked. Driven by the position of the attackers, [B]NOT[/B] on some metagamed state of mind. "I ignore the goblin [B]completely[/B] in order to avoid taking a Flanking bonus from his buddy the Ogre." Ignore a combatant totally? Closed eyes?!? Seriously!?! Sounds like the character is completely helpless vs that opponent that round... I don't see why the Goblin can't 'Coup de Grace' him (carefully and meticulously opening a femoral artery, say. Colorfully described as 'slicing the bottom off a water balloon'). Or, how about effectively Zero Dex? "Oh, I'm not ignoring him THAT much!" Fine. You're flanked. Unless I was feeling particularly annoyed, in which case it would be "TOO LATE. Here are some d6s and paper. Go roll up a new character. Next Rules Lawyer please." Harsh? Maybe, but the whole thing is silly. Another possibility: How effectively [B]can[/B] somebody ignore a goblin sawing away at one's kidney? Sounds like a Concentration Check at the very least. DC = the Combined Attack Rolls of the Flankers seems about right... Or screw it. Ogre is a 1st level Warrior. Goblin, sadly, is a 15th level Rogue/Assassin and he's been studying his target for the last three rounds. Guess Metagaming didn't pay off... But all of these are dodges. And punitive ones at that: Flanking should be a condition imposed by the position of the attackers. The whole see/no see state of mind thing raises too many loopholes. I even think invisible creatures should contribute to a Flank. I think one becomes at least subconsciously aware of the THREAT posed by an invisible creature once they move close enough to attack. The whole gestalt of sound, smell, air pressure, movement etc.*. Not enough to neccesarily target them effectively, but enough to be 'threatened' by them and therefore be flanked. That's just an interpretation though. A'Mal ______________________________________ * I've experienced this. Not, obviously, with invisible creatures, but in total darkness situations - both in martial arts classes (a thorough beating was enjoyed by all) and in photographic darkrooms. A person just standing quietly is quite easy to sense. One moving with any kind of rapidity is almost impossible to not sense. I'm not suggesting that being aware of them makes it easy to defend against them (IBID 'thorough beatings'), just that they would 'threaten' quite effectively... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneak attack + flanking = confusion
Top