Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneak Attack--Help me stop my DM from banishing it!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5412857" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>No, but you are willing to give Quarry to the Ranger automatically.</p><p></p><p>Ranger with CA: 17.75375</p><p>Ranger w/o CA: 15.87875</p><p>Ranger with CA w/o quarry: 14.15</p><p>Ranger w/o CA w/o quarry: 12.45</p><p></p><p>Rogue with CA: 19.9</p><p>Rogue w/o CA: 9.85</p><p></p><p>Let's be realistic here. Stealth rarely gives CA in many combat scenarios. In order to get hidden and hence get CA from Stealth, the Ranger has to find a location that has total concealment or superior cover. As a general rule, NPCs don't have hidden little nooks and crannies floating around their lairs</p><p></p><p>Yes, one might find this in the woods, but it's a somewhat rare occurance in the game system.</p><p></p><p>It would much easier for a Rogue with the Cunning Sneak Rogue Tactic to gain CA via Stealth than it ever would be for the Ranger with a bow to gain stealth.</p><p></p><p>Stealth used to be just cover or concealment to use. That's no longer the rule. The best the Ranger can typically do is fire without CA on round #1 without superior cover, and then move into superior cover. On round #2, move back to just cover and fire with CA. In such a scenario, he could gain CA every other round just by moving into and out of superior cover every other round. Course, a good DM wouldn't just let this happen every single encounter either.</p><p></p><p>As to other PCs giving CA to the Ranger, yes that can happen. However, it doesn't happen every single round. It might happen a couple of times per encounter. And, the Ranger probably won't be using Twin Strike on most of those "I now have CA" rounds. He'll more likely use an Encounter attack power or even a Daily attack power, trying to set up his own abillities.</p><p></p><p>The Defender, on the other hand, is going to try to set the Rogue up for flank every single round.</p><p></p><p>When there is 10 DPR difference between CA and no CA for the Rogue, you know that the players are going to try to set up CA for the Rogue whenever possible. They are not going to go out of their way to do that for the Ranger as frequently because the difference is so slim.</p><p></p><p>So yes, I suspect that the 19.9 DPR Rogue attacking with CA will happen most of the time. The 17.75375 DPR Ranger attacking with CA will happen a lot less frequently, probably at most half of the time in the best of cases.</p><p></p><p>And note: CA is not the same as things like a +2 power bonus to hit. So yes, other PCs will often give buffs to both the Rogue and the Ranger, but CA is a different beast.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another thing to look at is average damage.</p><p></p><p>The Rogue in your example here does 20.5 average damage if he hits.</p><p></p><p>The Ranger in your example here does either 12 average damage (one attack hits) or 20.5 average damage (both attacks hit).</p><p></p><p>From your "spike" theory above, it would appear to the DM that the Rogue is spiking more than the Ranger. The Ranger only does 20.5 damage 56% of the time. The Rogue does 20.5 damage 95% of the time.</p><p></p><p>Sure, the Ranger will get the occasional round of 30 points of damage. But the Rogue is slapping down 20 points of damage nearly every single round.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5412857, member: 2011"] No, but you are willing to give Quarry to the Ranger automatically. Ranger with CA: 17.75375 Ranger w/o CA: 15.87875 Ranger with CA w/o quarry: 14.15 Ranger w/o CA w/o quarry: 12.45 Rogue with CA: 19.9 Rogue w/o CA: 9.85 Let's be realistic here. Stealth rarely gives CA in many combat scenarios. In order to get hidden and hence get CA from Stealth, the Ranger has to find a location that has total concealment or superior cover. As a general rule, NPCs don't have hidden little nooks and crannies floating around their lairs Yes, one might find this in the woods, but it's a somewhat rare occurance in the game system. It would much easier for a Rogue with the Cunning Sneak Rogue Tactic to gain CA via Stealth than it ever would be for the Ranger with a bow to gain stealth. Stealth used to be just cover or concealment to use. That's no longer the rule. The best the Ranger can typically do is fire without CA on round #1 without superior cover, and then move into superior cover. On round #2, move back to just cover and fire with CA. In such a scenario, he could gain CA every other round just by moving into and out of superior cover every other round. Course, a good DM wouldn't just let this happen every single encounter either. As to other PCs giving CA to the Ranger, yes that can happen. However, it doesn't happen every single round. It might happen a couple of times per encounter. And, the Ranger probably won't be using Twin Strike on most of those "I now have CA" rounds. He'll more likely use an Encounter attack power or even a Daily attack power, trying to set up his own abillities. The Defender, on the other hand, is going to try to set the Rogue up for flank every single round. When there is 10 DPR difference between CA and no CA for the Rogue, you know that the players are going to try to set up CA for the Rogue whenever possible. They are not going to go out of their way to do that for the Ranger as frequently because the difference is so slim. So yes, I suspect that the 19.9 DPR Rogue attacking with CA will happen most of the time. The 17.75375 DPR Ranger attacking with CA will happen a lot less frequently, probably at most half of the time in the best of cases. And note: CA is not the same as things like a +2 power bonus to hit. So yes, other PCs will often give buffs to both the Rogue and the Ranger, but CA is a different beast. Another thing to look at is average damage. The Rogue in your example here does 20.5 average damage if he hits. The Ranger in your example here does either 12 average damage (one attack hits) or 20.5 average damage (both attacks hit). From your "spike" theory above, it would appear to the DM that the Rogue is spiking more than the Ranger. The Ranger only does 20.5 damage 56% of the time. The Rogue does 20.5 damage 95% of the time. Sure, the Ranger will get the occasional round of 30 points of damage. But the Rogue is slapping down 20 points of damage nearly every single round. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneak Attack--Help me stop my DM from banishing it!
Top