Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sneak Attack: optional or mandatory?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6176530" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I don't remember exactly how it went across playtest packages exactly, but the Rogue's <strong>Sneak Attack</strong> has been just an option at some point. </p><p></p><p>At different times, the designers had stated that they wanted Sneak Attack to be just an option, for example tied to some Rogue Schemes, but not a feature of all Rogues. IIRC there was a general consensus towards this idea. Currently however, it is indeed a feature of all Rogues.</p><p></p><p>Today I noticed that Mike Mearls tweeted (in response to Jeffrey Cox asking about a feature to swap Sneak Attack for something else, in a way similar to swapping Wizardry): "not sure if that would be in the PH - people really didn't like having to choose between SA and something else."</p><p></p><p>This is quite surprising for me... I don't mind if Sneak Attack is a fixed feature, but I really thought there were many more people wanting it optional than people wanting it mandatory!</p><p></p><p>So what's your take on this? Would you prefer (A) all Rogues to have the same Sneak Attack in common, or (B) only some specific Rogue subclasses, or do you actually like Jeffrey's proposal of (C) having it totally optional i.e. not tied to subclasses?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6176530, member: 1465"] I don't remember exactly how it went across playtest packages exactly, but the Rogue's [B]Sneak Attack[/B] has been just an option at some point. At different times, the designers had stated that they wanted Sneak Attack to be just an option, for example tied to some Rogue Schemes, but not a feature of all Rogues. IIRC there was a general consensus towards this idea. Currently however, it is indeed a feature of all Rogues. Today I noticed that Mike Mearls tweeted (in response to Jeffrey Cox asking about a feature to swap Sneak Attack for something else, in a way similar to swapping Wizardry): "not sure if that would be in the PH - people really didn't like having to choose between SA and something else." This is quite surprising for me... I don't mind if Sneak Attack is a fixed feature, but I really thought there were many more people wanting it optional than people wanting it mandatory! So what's your take on this? Would you prefer (A) all Rogues to have the same Sneak Attack in common, or (B) only some specific Rogue subclasses, or do you actually like Jeffrey's proposal of (C) having it totally optional i.e. not tied to subclasses? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sneak Attack: optional or mandatory?
Top