Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sneak Attack: optional or mandatory?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 6185040" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>This used to be my opinion, but I spent about a year tinkering with my own variant form of D&D, and after fooling around with the numbers for a while I came to the conclusion that it didn't work as well as I'd hoped. If a thief's combat contribution is mostly front-loaded into a first-round backstab, that backstab has to be unbelievably lethal to compensate for the thief's relative ineffectiveness afterward. If you're fighting a group of weak monsters instead of one or two big ones, a lot of that damage blows through to no effect. More importantly, it means that the thief's combat experience is very dull. You have one blast of excitement at the start and then you plink away with your crossbow or poke away with your shortsword, while everyone around you is laying the smack down.</p><p></p><p>However, if you give the thief some ability to pull a quick fade in combat, and put conditions on it so it a) makes sense in the fictional context and b) requires some maneuvering to make it work, the picture changes. Sneak attack can be scaled down to a sane level, and on the rounds when you aren't sneak attacking, you're not making weenie attacks. Instead you're trying to meet the conditions to hide so you can sneak attack again. I was still playing around with the exact mechanics when 5E was announced and I put the project aside, but I think it's a more promising avenue than the one-round-and-done model.</p><p></p><p>(For anyone wondering, the idea was that if you're a thief, you can lose yourself in the chaos of combat. If you don't do anything to draw attention to yourself, you can make a "skulk" roll. If it succeeds, your foes lose sight of you--they know you're there in a general sense, but as long as they're busy fighting your allies, they can't keep track of exactly where you are. The effect is broken if you attack; you can re-establish it by breaking your opponents' line of sight to you and making another roll. A foe that's determined not to lose sight of you can spend its action doing nothing but watching out for you, in which case the ability doesn't work on that foe. As soon as the fight ends, the ability stops working anyway.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 6185040, member: 58197"] This used to be my opinion, but I spent about a year tinkering with my own variant form of D&D, and after fooling around with the numbers for a while I came to the conclusion that it didn't work as well as I'd hoped. If a thief's combat contribution is mostly front-loaded into a first-round backstab, that backstab has to be unbelievably lethal to compensate for the thief's relative ineffectiveness afterward. If you're fighting a group of weak monsters instead of one or two big ones, a lot of that damage blows through to no effect. More importantly, it means that the thief's combat experience is very dull. You have one blast of excitement at the start and then you plink away with your crossbow or poke away with your shortsword, while everyone around you is laying the smack down. However, if you give the thief some ability to pull a quick fade in combat, and put conditions on it so it a) makes sense in the fictional context and b) requires some maneuvering to make it work, the picture changes. Sneak attack can be scaled down to a sane level, and on the rounds when you aren't sneak attacking, you're not making weenie attacks. Instead you're trying to meet the conditions to hide so you can sneak attack again. I was still playing around with the exact mechanics when 5E was announced and I put the project aside, but I think it's a more promising avenue than the one-round-and-done model. (For anyone wondering, the idea was that if you're a thief, you can lose yourself in the chaos of combat. If you don't do anything to draw attention to yourself, you can make a "skulk" roll. If it succeeds, your foes lose sight of you--they know you're there in a general sense, but as long as they're busy fighting your allies, they can't keep track of exactly where you are. The effect is broken if you attack; you can re-establish it by breaking your opponents' line of sight to you and making another roll. A foe that's determined not to lose sight of you can spend its action doing nothing but watching out for you, in which case the ability doesn't work on that foe. As soon as the fight ends, the ability stops working anyway.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sneak Attack: optional or mandatory?
Top