Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneak Attacks on Rays
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 287963" data-attributes="member: 1149"><p>[/B]</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>Missed? no. ignored deliberately? yes. </p><p></p><p>Well, i know the rogues in my game and in the game i have run with used ranged sneak attacks fairly often. Whether it was from the initial round flatfooted or from hiding or from invisible, it is far from "rarely." </p><p></p><p>In case you missed it, you don't get all those nifty extra attacks unless you have a full attack action. in those partial actions, from the surprise round where most of the flatfooted occurs, you only get one shot. </p><p></p><p>In case you missed it, rogue BABs are not the highest in the world, making their -5 cum iterative attacks a lot more likely to be misses than not, especially against very armored folk (which are PRECISELY the ones you want to use th touch attack against.)</p><p></p><p>10th level rogue with 20 dex, expertise and the various twf feats... attacks at basically +7 for bab +5 for expertise and say +2 for weapons (assumes two +2 shortswords worth ~16700 gold) for a net +14. Figuring in multiple attacks and twf he gets +12/+12/+7. His damage on a sneak hit is 6d6+2 or 23 points.</p><p>(numbers run almost identical with rapid shot.)</p><p></p><p>Against an AC 27 enemy (+2 full plate for +10 +1 large shield for +3, +4 from haste potion worth ~8000 gold, less than half the rogues swords alone) he has 14.95 expected damage per round.</p><p></p><p>Against the same enemy with a wand of ray of frost (costs 375 gold open market.) working against the touch AC of 14 (+4 for haste) he has an expected damage of 18.525. The rogue still has a move available too. Even if i add in the 15% or so UMD failure chance, the numbers are still better... 15.74</p><p></p><p>Your statement "clearly an option with less damage potential" is laughably meaningless. The "potential" for the multiple shots with low chance of hitting is really only there when he rolls REALLY well. At expected numbers, the ray of frost is superior AGAINST HIGHLY ARMORED foes.</p><p></p><p>Now we get to the secret whammy... HE CAN DO BOTH. For a measly 375 gold, mr roguely with his two shortswords and twf or his bow can also have a wand of ray of frost.</p><p></p><p>See the ray of frost is for HIGH ARMOR guys, those guys make the rogue feel his lower BAB and make every -2 for another shot a serious detriment. </p><p></p><p>its not "either/or" since there is nothing stopping him.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, look at the numbers. Against a highly armored foe, the numbers do not bear this theory out. The rogues bab combined with the "highly armored foe" makes the -5 iteratives and overall -2s for rapid fire/twf much more painful. His chances to hit are simply not that good.</p><p></p><p>The differences in chances to-hit against those people you want to use the ray of frost against are significant enough to make it work out.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>An interesting observation. i did the math and provided numbers. It does not seem to support your unnumbered claim.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Petrosian, post: 287963, member: 1149"] [/B][/QUOTE] Missed? no. ignored deliberately? yes. Well, i know the rogues in my game and in the game i have run with used ranged sneak attacks fairly often. Whether it was from the initial round flatfooted or from hiding or from invisible, it is far from "rarely." In case you missed it, you don't get all those nifty extra attacks unless you have a full attack action. in those partial actions, from the surprise round where most of the flatfooted occurs, you only get one shot. In case you missed it, rogue BABs are not the highest in the world, making their -5 cum iterative attacks a lot more likely to be misses than not, especially against very armored folk (which are PRECISELY the ones you want to use th touch attack against.) 10th level rogue with 20 dex, expertise and the various twf feats... attacks at basically +7 for bab +5 for expertise and say +2 for weapons (assumes two +2 shortswords worth ~16700 gold) for a net +14. Figuring in multiple attacks and twf he gets +12/+12/+7. His damage on a sneak hit is 6d6+2 or 23 points. (numbers run almost identical with rapid shot.) Against an AC 27 enemy (+2 full plate for +10 +1 large shield for +3, +4 from haste potion worth ~8000 gold, less than half the rogues swords alone) he has 14.95 expected damage per round. Against the same enemy with a wand of ray of frost (costs 375 gold open market.) working against the touch AC of 14 (+4 for haste) he has an expected damage of 18.525. The rogue still has a move available too. Even if i add in the 15% or so UMD failure chance, the numbers are still better... 15.74 Your statement "clearly an option with less damage potential" is laughably meaningless. The "potential" for the multiple shots with low chance of hitting is really only there when he rolls REALLY well. At expected numbers, the ray of frost is superior AGAINST HIGHLY ARMORED foes. Now we get to the secret whammy... HE CAN DO BOTH. For a measly 375 gold, mr roguely with his two shortswords and twf or his bow can also have a wand of ray of frost. See the ray of frost is for HIGH ARMOR guys, those guys make the rogue feel his lower BAB and make every -2 for another shot a serious detriment. its not "either/or" since there is nothing stopping him. Again, look at the numbers. Against a highly armored foe, the numbers do not bear this theory out. The rogues bab combined with the "highly armored foe" makes the -5 iteratives and overall -2s for rapid fire/twf much more painful. His chances to hit are simply not that good. The differences in chances to-hit against those people you want to use the ray of frost against are significant enough to make it work out. An interesting observation. i did the math and provided numbers. It does not seem to support your unnumbered claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneak Attacks on Rays
Top