Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Elvinis75" data-source="post: 1067969" data-attributes="member: 4379">Re: Re: Re: Re: My 2 cents1. That would be hard to pull off being a fighter v.s. a rogue 2.  The examples of attack types weren't meant as a delimiting factor 3.  Thus full attack allows a character to make multiple attacks as one action, the situation that you describe isn't following my example at all.  The disarm doesn't remove the invisibility as it is only part of the full attack action.  It can be an action by itself but in this case it isn't.  Say the AOO does happen, I thought that they are supposed to outside of the realm of time and attacks.  They don't count towards your normal actions that round.  But I think that I agree with you that this would end the invisibility because it is a self contained action. 4.  Why don't you answer my questions? 5.  Why create a hideous AOO string that has nothing to do with the question?  The rogue isn't going to sneak attack a sword nor is he going to open himself up to an AOO for no good reason.  I guess that it could happen but it is highly unlikely.  The question is whether or not a rogue could use a full attack action to attack before he/she becomes visible.  Your weird situation doesn't convince me that it doesn't work.  Just that I should wonder about the AOO if that situation come up.  It isn't part of the full attack action even if it happens in the middle of it.</blockquote>