Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Skaros" data-source="post: 1068783" data-attributes="member: 1401">Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My 2 centsActually, it clearly talks about when the invisible person attacks someone, and doesn't mention the word 'action' at all in the section quoted above.  By extension then, we should basically allow the rogue to sneak attack for the whole combat after he was briefly invisible in the beginning.I still don't understand where you got your interpretation of invisiblity that talks about "actions" instead of attacks.  Maybe you are looking at the section where it says "Actions directed at unattended objects do not break the spell." ?Is that the snippet of the spell description that you are using to say that it is either talking about a full attack action or a standard action, etc ?Skaros</blockquote>