Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneaking Rogue’s and AoO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 567249" data-attributes="member: 2829"><p>It's possible that I misinterpreted the tone of your post.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right, which is why I said "I can understand that".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I realize that. I was saying that I understand where you're coming from, but I was also saying that 2nd edition logic doesn't really apply.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>More or less.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right, and I disagree with you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. I'm pushing for a scenario that isn't explicitly and directly covered in the rules, a scenario that is only covered with extrapolation of said rules, as opposed to being able to point to a line of text and saying "There" like usual. There's a difference.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Neither can I, thus the problem, thus the discussion, thus differing opinions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's because there's no such thing as "Tuesday" in 3rd Edition.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree. I just don't agree with your 'common sense'. I like mine, and others', better.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So do I, and as far as I'm concerned, I have.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But that's just it. From what I can tell, I'm not changing them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Same goes for me and my own argument, thus a discussion, thus a disagreement. It's no big deal if we disagree.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Others do, others do not. This thing is nearly split right down the middle. It's a mess. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except that in this case, I don't think either of the results (yours or mine) are counter-intuitive. I just think one is more sensible and logical than the other.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The tone of your post.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's cool. I get ya'. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not at all. Yesterday was a great day. I got off work early for the new years and got to run my D20 Modern game. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not necessary. I believe you when you say you weren't trying to be offensive. It's all good. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kreynolds, post: 567249, member: 2829"] It's possible that I misinterpreted the tone of your post. Right, which is why I said "I can understand that". I realize that. I was saying that I understand where you're coming from, but I was also saying that 2nd edition logic doesn't really apply. More or less. Right, and I disagree with you. No. I'm pushing for a scenario that isn't explicitly and directly covered in the rules, a scenario that is only covered with extrapolation of said rules, as opposed to being able to point to a line of text and saying "There" like usual. There's a difference. Neither can I, thus the problem, thus the discussion, thus differing opinions. That's because there's no such thing as "Tuesday" in 3rd Edition. I agree. I just don't agree with your 'common sense'. I like mine, and others', better. So do I, and as far as I'm concerned, I have. But that's just it. From what I can tell, I'm not changing them. Same goes for me and my own argument, thus a discussion, thus a disagreement. It's no big deal if we disagree. Others do, others do not. This thing is nearly split right down the middle. It's a mess. :) Except that in this case, I don't think either of the results (yours or mine) are counter-intuitive. I just think one is more sensible and logical than the other. The tone of your post. That's cool. I get ya'. :cool: Not at all. Yesterday was a great day. I got off work early for the new years and got to run my D20 Modern game. :D That's not necessary. I believe you when you say you weren't trying to be offensive. It's all good. :cool: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sneaking Rogue’s and AoO
Top