Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So… psionic powers are no longer purely mental?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9861744" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>I think the problem (as you are painfully aware) is that D&D players no longer want the same things. I would have loved three different psionics methods to rank and vote over, but we were given the mystic and told to quibble over the details, which meant people nitpicked it to death. Some liked the idea but not the execution. Some hated it and wanted something closer to that 2e or 3e or 4e provided (which themselves are different experiences). Some wanted no psionics at all. Some wanted some idea that was totally off the wall and some didn't know what they wanted, but that sure wasn't it. That's a LOT more people who have qualms with the mystic than who didn't, and even if they were not a united front, it was enough to deep six what was going on with it for half a decade. </p><p></p><p>In light of how many good ideas got ripped to shreds by a community who didn't have a idea what they wanted except "not that" is it surprising that playtests are glorified popularity contests?</p><p></p><p>Of course, A/B testing has it's issues, as people who liked certain Xanathar's subclasses who didn't make "the cut" can attest. Those ideas were never revisited to see if they could be improved, they get forgotten and lost. For that, I'd rather have WotC give me an idea and see if it vibes rather than give me six options and let the top three exist at the cost of the other three. I'm not convinced things like the dance bard would have seen the light of day in a ranked vote system....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 9861744, member: 7635"] I think the problem (as you are painfully aware) is that D&D players no longer want the same things. I would have loved three different psionics methods to rank and vote over, but we were given the mystic and told to quibble over the details, which meant people nitpicked it to death. Some liked the idea but not the execution. Some hated it and wanted something closer to that 2e or 3e or 4e provided (which themselves are different experiences). Some wanted no psionics at all. Some wanted some idea that was totally off the wall and some didn't know what they wanted, but that sure wasn't it. That's a LOT more people who have qualms with the mystic than who didn't, and even if they were not a united front, it was enough to deep six what was going on with it for half a decade. In light of how many good ideas got ripped to shreds by a community who didn't have a idea what they wanted except "not that" is it surprising that playtests are glorified popularity contests? Of course, A/B testing has it's issues, as people who liked certain Xanathar's subclasses who didn't make "the cut" can attest. Those ideas were never revisited to see if they could be improved, they get forgotten and lost. For that, I'd rather have WotC give me an idea and see if it vibes rather than give me six options and let the top three exist at the cost of the other three. I'm not convinced things like the dance bard would have seen the light of day in a ranked vote system.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So… psionic powers are no longer purely mental?
Top