Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So 5 Intelligence Huh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonnyP71" data-source="post: 6830358" data-attributes="member: 6788862"><p>My own point of view when DMing a game with a character with a very low stat (which is common as my groups always roll for stats) is that I will talk to the player beforehand and agree with them how the low stat translates into a suitable deficiency, and how the player will roleplay that PC.</p><p></p><p>5 Int can mean simply low mental capacity, lack of education, forgetfulness, illiteracy, lack of numeracy, etc - and depending on the skill proficiencies chosen, I would likely ask the player to consider at least 2 (or more) of those issues and roleplay them accordingly.</p><p></p><p>My own 6 Int fighter is semi-literate, from a nomadic tribe, with no formal education. He will hold a map upside down and claim to be 'reading' it, and has given the party food poisoning after insisting he is a good cook. It's all good fun.</p><p></p><p>I also have a wizard with a strength penalty, it's only a -1, but I play him as refusing to partake in any physical activity beyond walking (or running away!) - he's level 8 and has made just one voluntary melee attack in his entire adventuring career! If a door needs forcing he won't even try. (this gets around the daft scenario that in 5E an 8 Str character can feasibly succeed on a test of strength that 20 Str character fails!)</p><p></p><p>Another aspect we consider in our group is that our DMs often state that only PCs with a suitable proficiency are able to even try certain tasks. This is situational, but most commonly applicable to Survival/Nature/History/Religion/Arcana checks.... rather than simply ramping up the difficulty of an obscure Lore check our DM might say 'only those characters with Arcana proficiency have a chance of understanding this scroll'.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I'm rambling slightly off topic. Summary - I'd be happy to allow a 5 Int character to be ok at some Int based tasks, but the player of that PC would have to accept that I would need them to properly roleplay other suitable reasons for their Int being so low.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonnyP71, post: 6830358, member: 6788862"] My own point of view when DMing a game with a character with a very low stat (which is common as my groups always roll for stats) is that I will talk to the player beforehand and agree with them how the low stat translates into a suitable deficiency, and how the player will roleplay that PC. 5 Int can mean simply low mental capacity, lack of education, forgetfulness, illiteracy, lack of numeracy, etc - and depending on the skill proficiencies chosen, I would likely ask the player to consider at least 2 (or more) of those issues and roleplay them accordingly. My own 6 Int fighter is semi-literate, from a nomadic tribe, with no formal education. He will hold a map upside down and claim to be 'reading' it, and has given the party food poisoning after insisting he is a good cook. It's all good fun. I also have a wizard with a strength penalty, it's only a -1, but I play him as refusing to partake in any physical activity beyond walking (or running away!) - he's level 8 and has made just one voluntary melee attack in his entire adventuring career! If a door needs forcing he won't even try. (this gets around the daft scenario that in 5E an 8 Str character can feasibly succeed on a test of strength that 20 Str character fails!) Another aspect we consider in our group is that our DMs often state that only PCs with a suitable proficiency are able to even try certain tasks. This is situational, but most commonly applicable to Survival/Nature/History/Religion/Arcana checks.... rather than simply ramping up the difficulty of an obscure Lore check our DM might say 'only those characters with Arcana proficiency have a chance of understanding this scroll'. Anyway, I'm rambling slightly off topic. Summary - I'd be happy to allow a 5 Int character to be ok at some Int based tasks, but the player of that PC would have to accept that I would need them to properly roleplay other suitable reasons for their Int being so low. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So 5 Intelligence Huh
Top